Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Robbie Harwood]

"Dominic Cleal" <dominic(a)cleal.org&gt; writes:

>  Hi Robbie,
>
>  On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, at 4:54 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for
> > Dominic Cleal.
> > [..]
> > So, does anyone know how to contact Dominic?
>
>  You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I
>  don't plan on making any more contributions. 
Appreciate the prompt response, and thanks for your past work!

Thanks,
--Robbie

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Miro Hrončok]

On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>  You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit.
> I
>  don't plan on making any more contributions. 
Done.

domcleal is maintainer of rpms/augeas
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/augeas
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/augeas
domcleal is watching rpms/direnv
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/direnv
domcleal is main admin of rpms/freight
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/freight
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/freight
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/puppet
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/puppet
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/puppet
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/ruby-augeas
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/ruby-augeas
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/ruby-augeas
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-ffi
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-ffi
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ffi
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-jgrep
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-jgrep
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-jgrep
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-ldap_fluff
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-ldap_fluff
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ldap_fluff
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-paint
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-paint
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-paint
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-pg
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-pg
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-pg
domcleal has a bugzilla override on rpms/rubygem-pg
   domcleal has no longer a bugzilla overrides on rpms/rubygem-pg
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-rkerberos
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-rkerberos
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-rkerberos
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-ruby-libvirt
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-ruby-libvirt
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-libvirt
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-scoped_search
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-scoped_search
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-scoped_search
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/rubygem-sinatra
   domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/rubygem-sinatra
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-sinatra
domcleal has a bugzilla override on rpms/rubygem-sinatra
   domcleal has no longer a bugzilla overrides on rpms/rubygem-sinatra
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-wirb
   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-wirb
   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-wirb

-- 
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi Robbie,

I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at lest
the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are
now in danger of being removed from Fedora.

Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some of them.


Vít


Dne 01. 09. 20 v 20:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>  On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I
> > don't plan on making any more contributions.
>
>  Done.
>
>  domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>    domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>    domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>  domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>    domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>    domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>  domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>    domcleal is no longer the main admin of
>  rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>    domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Greg Hellings]

Vit, et al,

My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
personal investment into Ruby. So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby
packages as I don't pay much attention to the space.

--Greg

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:38 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi Robbie,
>
>  I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at lest
>  the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are
>  now in danger of being removed from Fedora.
>
>  Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some of them.
>
>
>  Vít
>
>
>  Dne 01. 09. 20 v 20:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>  > On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>  >> You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I
>  >> don't plan on making any more contributions.
>  >
>  > Done.
>  >
>  > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>  >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>  >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>  > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>  >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>  >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>  > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>  >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of
>  > rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>  >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>  >
>
>

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a):
>  Vit, et al,
>
>  My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
>  personal investment into Ruby. 

That is perfectly fine.


>  So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby packages as I don't
> pay
>  much attention to the space. 

But if rubygem-unicode-display_width is going to be retired due to being
orphaned, your rubygem-terminal-table package is going to be in trouble.
I think it is your responsibility to do something about it (even if it
should be just orphaning). Nevertheless, rubygem-jekyll maintainers
might be interested to take over your rubygem-terminal-table, because
this is the dependency chain:

rubygem-unicode-display_width <= rubygem-terminal-table <= rubygem-jekyll


Vít



>  --Greg
>
>  On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:38 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com
>  <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>      Hi Robbie,
>
>      I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at
>      lest
>      the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are
>      now in danger of being removed from Fedora.
>
>      Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some
>      of them.
>
>
>      Vít
>
>
>      Dne 01. 09. 20 v 20:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>      > On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>      >> You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see
>      fit. I
>      >> don't plan on making any more contributions.
>      >
>      > Done.
>      >
>      > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>      >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>      >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
>      > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>      >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>      >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
>      > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>      >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of
>      > rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>      >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
>      >
>

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Greg Hellings]

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:43 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a):
>
>  Vit, et al,
>
>  My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
>  personal investment into Ruby.
>
>
>  That is perfectly fine.
>
>
>  So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby packages as I don't pay much
>  attention to the space.
>
>
>  But if rubygem-unicode-display_width is going to be retired due to being
>  orphaned, your rubygem-terminal-table package is going to be in trouble. I
>  think it is your responsibility to do something about it (even if it should
>  be just orphaning). Nevertheless, rubygem-jekyll maintainers might be
>  interested to take over your rubygem-terminal-table, because this is the
>  dependency chain:
>
>  rubygem-unicode-display_width <= rubygem-terminal-table <= rubygem-jekyll
>  
Orphaning would be my go-to if no one else steps up to take it over. The
other packages I have retired didn't have anything depending on them, so
they just silently slipped by. I'm willing to hand off ownership of any
packages that are threatened by this change. The same goes for other
rubygems in my name. I'm happy to keep them until they need more attention
than version bumps, but if they become a maintenance burden I would more
than happily hand them off.

--Greg

>  Vít
>
>
>
>
>  --Greg
>
>  On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:38 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > Hi Robbie,
> >
> > I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at lest
> > the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are
> > now in danger of being removed from Fedora.
> >
> > Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some of them.
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> > Dne 01. 09. 20 v 20:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > > On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > >> You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I
> > >> don't plan on making any more contributions.
> > >
> > > Done.
> > >
> > > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
> > >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
> > >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-Ascii85
> > > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
> > >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
> > >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-ruby-rc4
> > > domcleal is main admin of rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
> > >   domcleal is no longer the main admin of
> > > rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
> > >   domcleal is no longer watching rpms/rubygem-unicode-display_width
> > >
> >
> >

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Robbie Harwood]

Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:

>  Hi Robbie,
>
>  I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, 
If you're asking if I plan to take them, I do not.  They have been
orphaned, so anyone interested can pick them up.  (They should refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
which has the full process.)

>  be cause at lest the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other
>  packages and they are now in danger of being removed from Fedora. 
That's a problem that needs to be fixed.  But now it *can* be fixed,
instead of those packages building on a house of cards.

Thanks,
--Robbie

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 02. 09. 20 v 17:19 Robbie Harwood napsal(a):
>  Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:
>
> > Hi Robbie,
> >
> > I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages,
>  If you're asking if I plan to take them, I do not. 

Thx for clarification. Since the first ticket was rubygem- it just
caught my attention.


Vít


>    They have been
>  orphaned, so anyone interested can pick them up.  (They should refer to
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
>  which has the full process.)
>
> > be cause at lest the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other
> > packages and they are now in danger of being removed from Fedora.
>  That's a problem that needs to be fixed.  But now it *can* be fixed,
>  instead of those packages building on a house of cards.
>
>  Thanks,
>  --Robbie