On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>Seems to be due to systemd-202:
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
>It's a bug in glibc actually:
>
>http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
>
>I found it in gnulib testing yesterday:
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-04/threads.html#00040
>
>Rich.
>
Well, I would blame glibc, but even if that is glibc, it is exposed
just with systemd-202 and not systemd-201. This is interesting to me
and I would love to know the reasons. I am not expert here, so I
hope somebody can explain. Thanks.
It may be a different bug in that case. The glibc bug affects all
processes that call getaddrinfo [when there is no network, as in Koji],
whether or not systemd is even installed in the same buildroot.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)