On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase
changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15.
I don't think this soname bump even happened by accident, because the
.so file names %files entries in the .spec file were explicitly
adapted to the changed version number ...
Do some people really just blatantly ignore the current updates policy [0]?
It explicitly states that ABI bumps should be announced a week before
they are pushed to *rawhide* to coordinate with dependent packages,
and that they should be "avoided if at all possible" in branched ...
Fabio
[0]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
> x86_64 Fedora 32 contains these packages needs rebuilding:
>
> # dnf --quiet repoquery --whatrequires 'libproj.so.13()(64bit)' --source |
sed 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*$//' | sort -f -u | grep -v '^proj$'
> gdal
> grass
> libgeotiff
> libspatialite
> mapnik
> mapserver
> merkaartor
> ncl
> ogdi
> osm2pgsql
> perl-Geo-Proj4
> perl-PDL
> postgis
> pyproj
> python-cartopy
> qgis
> qlandkartegt
> qmapshack
> qt-mobility
> R-rgdal
> saga
> spatialite-gui
> vtk
>
> A similar issue is in Fedora 31 where the rebuilds should go to proj
> update <
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-29c418b1d7>.
>
> -- Petr
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org