Review or swap for burp - network backup

[Andrew Niemantsverdriet]

Hello Everyone,

I have a package that I would like reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819

Burp is a network backup program, it provides a way automate backups.

I would appreciate a review and I'm willing to do a review swap with
somebody.

Thank you,
-- 
 _
/-\ ndrew Niemantsverdriet
Linux System Administrator
Academic Computing
[phone]
Rocky Mountain College
1511 Poly Dr.
Billings MT, 59102

[gil]

Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
Requested the intervention of Fedora Legal Tracker guys, for a check
Note: i asked not long ago if neo4j project, with the same Affero 
General Public License,
can be imported in Fedora, but is not possible for my case.
If the package can be imported can you review this 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214396 for me?
thanks
regards
gil

[1] https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j http://www.neo4j.org/

Il 07/05/2015 17:18, Andrew Niemantsverdriet ha scritto:
>  Hello Everyone,
>
>  I have a package that I would like reviewed: 
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
>  *
>  *
>  Burp is a network backup program, it provides a way automate backups.
>
>  I would appreciate a review and I'm willing to do a review swap with 
>  somebody.
>
>  Thank you,
>  -- 
>   _
>  /-\ ndrew Niemantsverdriet
>  Linux System Administrator
>  Academic Computing
>  [phone]
>  Rocky Mountain College
>  1511 Poly Dr.
>  Billings MT, 59102
>
>

[Jerry James]

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; wrote:
>  Hi
>  I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora 
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
for lists of good and bad licenses.  AGPLv3 is on the list of good
licenses.

HTH.  Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/

[gil]

Il 08/05/2015 00:37, Jerry James ha scritto:
>  On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt;
> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
>  See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
>  for lists of good and bad licenses.  AGPLv3 is on the list of good
>  licenses.
>
>  HTH.  Regards, 
yes i know but that page seem not updated ...

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 00:42 +0200, gil wrote:
>  Il 08/05/2015 00:37, Jerry James ha scritto:
>  > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; wrote:
>  > > Hi
>  > > I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
>  > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Soft
>  > wareLicenses
>  > for lists of good and bad licenses.  AGPLv3 is on the list of good
>  > licenses.
>  > 
>  > HTH.  Regards,
>  yes i know but that page seem not updated ... 
It is actively maintained. It just doesn't need to change much. It's
very unlikely an existing license which had previously been checked
would suddenly be found to be incompatible with Fedora's policies,
anyway - the page would only likely need a wholesale update if
Fedora's rules changed.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net