Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide

[Quentin Armitage]

Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide, to
allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to
the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This
is a backport from Asterisk 1.6.1.5 (and possibly earlier versions).

BTW - is Asterisk currently being maintained in Rawhide. I see that
there has been no update for a day or two shot of 6 months, although
Asterisk has moved on from 1.6.1-rc1 to 1.6.1.5 in the intervening time.

The attached patch is a quick way to get Asterisk to build and be
installable again (and also not block the mass updates of openssl).
There are requests in bz to update Asterisk to 1.6.1.5, and I am working
on that in slowtime.

[Jeffrey Ollie]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Quentin Armitage<Quentin(a)armitage.org.uk> wrote:
>  Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide,
> to
>  allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to
>  the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This
>  is a backport from Asterisk 1.6.1.5 (and possibly earlier versions).
>
>  BTW - is Asterisk currently being maintained in Rawhide. I see that
>  there has been no update for a day or two shot of 6 months, although
>  Asterisk has moved on from 1.6.1-rc1 to 1.6.1.5 in the intervening time.
>
>  The attached patch is a quick way to get Asterisk to build and be
>  installable again (and also not block the mass updates of openssl).
>  There are requests in bz to update Asterisk to 1.6.1.5, and I am working
>  on that in slowtime. 
I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's taking
_forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the
various patches.  I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so
I'm not blocking the openssl update.

-- 
Jeff Ollie

[itamar]

We need to send to upstream the patches.

maintaining thousand's of patches is not a easy work

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jeffrey Ollie<jeff(a)ocjtech.us> wrote:
>  On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Quentin
> Armitage<Quentin(a)armitage.org.uk> wrote:
> > Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide, to
> > allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to
> > the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This
> > is a backport from Asterisk 1.6.1.5 (and possibly earlier versions).
> >
> > BTW - is Asterisk currently being maintained in Rawhide. I see that
> > there has been no update for a day or two shot of 6 months, although
> > Asterisk has moved on from 1.6.1-rc1 to 1.6.1.5 in the intervening time.
> >
> > The attached patch is a quick way to get Asterisk to build and be
> > installable again (and also not block the mass updates of openssl).
> > There are requests in bz to update Asterisk to 1.6.1.5, and I am working
> > on that in slowtime.
>
>  I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's taking
>  _forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the
>  various patches.  I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so
>  I'm not blocking the openssl update.
>
>  --
>  Jeff Ollie
>
>  --
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>  


-- 
------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
sip: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
[phone]
[phone]

[Benny Amorsen]

Jeffrey Ollie <jeff(a)ocjtech.us&gt; writes:

>  I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's
> taking
>  _forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the
>  various patches.  I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so
>  I'm not blocking the openssl update. 
Is it really worth maintaining a significant amount of patches? With
my private build of 1.6.1.6 I currently use these patches:

Patch1:  0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch
Patch2:  0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch
Patch5:  0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch
Patch6:  0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch
Patch8:  0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch
Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch
Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch
Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch

I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1
versions, just to make them apply.

I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in
asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in.
I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6
months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use
Lua.

Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream...


/Benny

[Jeffrey Ollie]

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Benny Amorsen<benny+usenet(a)amorsen.dk> wrote:
>  Patch1:  0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch
>  Patch2:  0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch
>  Patch5:  0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch
>  Patch6:  0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch
>  Patch8:  0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch
>  Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch
>  Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch
>  Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch 
Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide.  The rawhide packages
should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up
shortly. I basically did the same thing as you.

>  I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1
>  versions, just to make them apply. 
Yeah, fortunately it was less work than I thought.  I've really grown
to depend on git's merging/rebasing/cherry-picking abilities.
Hopefully my git mirror of the asterisk svn will finish rebuilding
soon.  Digium may also be putting up a semi-official git mirror as
well.

>  I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in
>  asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in. 
Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I added it in.

>  I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in
> 6
>  months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use
>  Lua.
>
>  Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream... 
Yeah, it's a matter of time/energy.  Plus a couple of them really need
some polishing before they would even be considered.

-- 
Jeff Ollie

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:17:55 -0500,
  Jeffrey Ollie <jeff(a)ocjtech.us&gt; wrote:
>  
>  Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide.  The rawhide packages
>  should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up
>  shortly. I basically did the same thing as you. 
That's for doing those updates. I had given up on it when after some upgrade
(probably the kernel) broken it so that it would lock up (at least the part
handling my tdm400p) after about a half hour.

It may be the real fix is update dahdi drivers from ATrpms, but your update
is what triggered my checking to see if there was updated Dahdi drivers
to go with updated asterisk.

I did notice the updated dahdi drivers use dahdi-channels.conf instead of
chan-dahdi.conf. So people will want to do includes, copies or sym links
between those two files.

I am hoping the setup will still be working during the Fedora Talk FAD
when I hope to participate remotely for at least some of the time.