Hello,
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept were Parag AN(पराग), Andrew Overholt , and Jason Tibbitts. Below is the number of package reviews completed.
Start Date: 2009-09-01 00:00:00 End Date: 2009-09-12 00:00:00
Parag AN(पराग) - 21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357
Andrew Overholt - 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394
Jason Tibbitts - 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Mamoru Tasaka - 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859
Steve Traylen - 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764
Adam Williamson - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988
Adel Gadllah - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148
Andrew Beekhof - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563
Bastien Nocera - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986
Dennis Gilmore - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979
Dominic Hopf - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431
Gareth John - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799
Jan Klepek - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866
Jussi Lehtola - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030
Martin Gieseking - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065
Michel Alexandre Salim - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446
Milos Jakubicek - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491
Paul Howarth - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114
Peter Robinson - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017
Remi Collet - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017
Rex Dieter - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245
Richard W.M. Jones - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319
Sven Lankes - 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523
Total reviews modified: 55 Merge Reviews: 0 Review Requests: 53 This report by generated by bzReviewReport.py. The source is available at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py Please submit patches or bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/
Next time onwards it would be a weekly report.
This looks like a nice initiative. I hope it will lead to more reviews getting done and reduce the waiting time.
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Below is the number of package reviews completed.
[55 bugzilla links]
Total reviews modified: 55
I think the wording needs to be improved here. Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Review Requests: 53
If that's 53 out of the 55, it makes me wonder what the last two were. If it means 53 *new* review requests submitted, that could be made clearer. If it's not 53 new review requests, would it be possible to include that number too, so we can see whether the backlog is growing or shrinking?
Björn Persson
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
This looks like a nice initiative. I hope it will lead to more reviews getting done and reduce the waiting time.
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Below is the number of package reviews completed.
[55 bugzilla links]
Total reviews modified: 55
I think the wording needs to be improved here. Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
Review Requests: 53
If that's 53 out of the 55, it makes me wonder what the last two were. If it means 53 *new* review requests submitted, that could be made clearer. If it's not 53 new review requests, would it be possible to include that number too, so we can see whether the backlog is growing or shrinking?
Other 2 are merge reviews. I will confirm and make it a point to put it in report, along with number of new review requests.
Thank you for suggestions.
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews, not finished ones. Not sure which is better, but by silently changing the criteria, we are counting several reviews twice.
Regards, Christoph
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews, not finished ones. Not sure which is better, but by silently changing the criteria, we are counting several reviews twice.
Not completed ones, I check the date when fedora-review flag goes to '+' . So for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 it was calculated not calculated because flag was set on 31st Aug.
Thanks,
2009/9/14 Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews, not finished ones. Not sure which is better, but by silently changing the criteria, we are counting several reviews twice.
Not completed ones, I check the date when fedora-review flag goes to '+' . So for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 it was calculated not calculated because flag was set on 31st Aug.
Instead it came came into count in last report https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-September/msg00249.ht... which was for 4 months without urls.
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 09:27 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews, not finished ones. Not sure which is better, but by silently changing the criteria, we are counting several reviews twice.
Not completed ones, I check the date when fedora-review flag goes to '+' .
Thanks for the clarification. Do you also check for packages that have the flag set to '-'?
Regards, Christoph
2009/9/15 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 09:27 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
[..]
Not completed ones, I check the date when fedora-review flag goes to '+' .
Thanks for the clarification. Do you also check for packages that have the flag set to '-'?
Not yet. I plan to put that calculation in.
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 15:07 +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept were Parag AN(पराग), Andrew Overholt , and Jason Tibbitts.
Looks like Mamoru Tasaka shares the 3rd place with Jason. I don't like highlighting scores, but if you have to, then it is only fair not to leave people out :-)
Simo.
2009/9/13 Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 15:07 +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept were Parag AN(पराग), Andrew Overholt , and Jason Tibbitts.
Looks like Mamoru Tasaka shares the 3rd place with Jason. I don't like highlighting scores, but if you have to, then it is only fair not to leave people out :-)
Thanks for pointing out. I mistakenly missed it. ;)
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 15:07 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
Hello,
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept ...
This means 1st till 12th September, right? What about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 ?
Regards, Christoph
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com wrote:
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept were Parag AN(पराग), Andrew Overholt , and Jason Tibbitts. Below is the number of package reviews completed.
Thank you for the statistics. Since you plan to make this a weekly run, is it possible to approach the FWN folks for a look-see into whether this can be a data point in each week's issue ?
-
Björn Persson -
Christoph Wickert -
Rakesh Pandit -
sankarshan -
Simo Sorce