Il 27/05/23 11:56, Peter Oliver ha scritto:
If we’re going to recommend migration to anything, shouldn’t it be enchant2? Users would
be able to configure their preferred spellchecking engine per language (which I imagine is
more important for some languages than others), and we wouldn’t have to go through this
again in the future if we hypothetically decided that, say, Nuspell should replace
Hunspell as our default spellchecker.
+1 here. If we have to convince upstream to migrate to a different
default spellchecker, I think it's better to push enchant2. If it is
about having the package maintainer build their package against another
spellchecker, hunspell is fine, but drop a note about enchant2 is preferred.
I'd also like to raise attention to what I think is a misleading Change
Deprecating aspell package because it is no longer
Required/Buildrequired by any package in Fedora.
This is clearly not true, as the
change is about migrating package to