On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Ruth Suehle wrote:
> I've always thought of it as a general gauge of community
interest in
> the topic, which hopefully corresponds to the interest of the people
> going. We could try simply messaging that better — and by "we", I
> definitely include myself, because I know I've said things like
> "voting is open everyone come vote, and hope to see you there".
While conceptually that works, "I got all my friends to vote for me" isn't
a good gauge of overall interest. This is also partly why the final
schedule is 99% community vote with 1% room for something like if not
enough people voted on hearing the Fedora Council get together, but we know
that's still important, we put it on the schedule anyway.
I guess also my corresponding assumption was that it was more like 20%
community vote.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader