On 07/01/2015 02:24 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
It's actually not the booking the room that I'm offended by,
it's the
fact that people have clearly been having meetings about my team not
actually including my team or at least informing us of it in
reasonable time and that I'm finding out about it through the booking
of a room for a meeting long after the initial meeting happened.
My guess is - having spent a fair bit of time in the community room at
the Summit last week myself - all of the mentioned-by-name folks
involved in the conversation in question were at the Summit, as they all
spent time in that room at some point, and maybe were talking about
Flock and maybe the idea came up that the CentOS rel-eng could benefit
from sharing notes with the Fedora rel-eng team. (Paul is manager to
some rel-eng folks too - Adam and Kevin...)
I mean, Stephen could say for sure, clearly, but I can't read anything
sinister in to that other than folks end up talking at in-person events
and get random organic ideas... it's only the week after, I haven't even
finished up all the follow-ups I know I have to do from Summit
conversations, and it's vagueishly a holiday week in the US
(Independence Day is this weekend,) so not everyone is around to follow
up with anyway.
I mean, in the light you paint it - yes, that is freaking annoying, I
would be uber-pissed too if someone made plans for say the Fedora Design
Team without actually including any of us or contacting us directly. I
totally understand your frustration. But thinking about it as just an
organic conversation that happened amongst Summit attendees thinking of
ways to make stuff generally better without ill intentions, it doesn't
seem quite so sinister does it?
~m