[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680
--- Comment #37 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-30 23:20:05 EDT ---
I'm afraid the part of the above config doesn't do the right thing what you
said at least. "not_eq" affects all of fonts except you explicitly described
there. it exactly overrides the global settings, regardless of whether or not
the result is same. fontconfig config that the font package owns should have
its specific config only. otherwise it should be modified in one fontconfig
has.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680
--- Comment #36 from Baif <baif(a)pogolinux.com.cn> 2008-10-30 22:12:14 EDT ---
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'>
<fontconfig>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family" compare="not_eq">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="rgba" >
<const>none</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family" compare="not_eq">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family" compare="not_eq">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" >
<const>hintfull</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family" compare="not_eq">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<test compare="more_eq" name="size" qual="any" >
<double>8</double>
</test>
<test compare="less_eq" name="size" qual="any" >
<double>12</double>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias" >
<bool>false</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<test name="family">
<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
<string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
</test>
<test compare="more_eq" name="pixelsize" qual="any" >
<double>11</double>
</test>
<test compare="less_eq" name="pixelsize" qual="any" >
<double>17</double>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias" >
<bool>false</bool>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680
Baif <baif(a)pogolinux.com.cn> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |baif(a)pogolinux.com.cn
--- Comment #35 from Baif <baif(a)pogolinux.com.cn> 2008-10-30 22:06:57 EDT ---
It's true that "A font package must not
override global antialiasing settings.".
Please read the conf I had modified a little bit which enclosed with this
reply. And it should replace:
"/etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 461039] New: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039
Summary: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some
websites
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pacho(a)condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=315657)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315657)
good.png
Description of problem:
At first, I am using liberation fonts on a Gentoo system, I have already tried
to send this to https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/wiki but I am unable
to login succesfully. I am using epiphany-2.22.3 built against xulrunner-1.8
and gnome-2.22, I have tried with "Sans" and "liberation sans" fonts, both with
the same problem (and with size 10)
Gentoo ships an old set of liberation fonts (seems to really be
liberation-fonts-0.2) but they work FINE with most of websites (at least, all I
have tried), then, I have updated to 1.04.2 (and later to 1.04.90 with the same
problem) and I have started to have problems with sites like:
http://elmundo.es/
I can reproduce this problem always, if I put the mouse pointer over a link
bellow first titular (their size is a bit smaller than fist titular) only part
of text is underlined, other part not
I attach two screenshots showing proper (with old liberation-fonts) and
unproper behavior (with new)
This also occurs, for example, with:
http://www.lavozdeasturias.es/
http://elperiodico.com/
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.04.2 or superior
How reproducible:
Simply try to move mouse over links in mentioned webpages (not all links fail,
maybe it could be related with size)
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-29 13:34:34 EDT ---
We've merged a lot of Asian (Korean...) fonts lately, maybe it's one of them
You really need to have Behdad audit the fontconfig priority level given to all
recent CJK fonts (and I include fonts in the pipeline like hanazono).
For example, I've seen CJK packages that proposed 59 as priority, when our
guidelines (which match upstream's) state the highest priority for a non LGC
font should be 65.
I hope we'll not repeat the arms race between Chinese/Japanese/Korean users
where each one tries to one-up the other and put himself higher in the priority
queue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months