October 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.18,1.19

by cchance

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20058 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: retag Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:09:07 -0000 1.18 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:16:02 -0000 1.19 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 9.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-9.1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.17,1.18

by cchance

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19372 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 05:36:43 -0000 1.17 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:09:07 -0000 1.18 @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai %define fcdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d -%define fcdiravail %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.avail %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d @@ -10,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -87,23 +86,13 @@ # fontconfig config files install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail} for conf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - if [ $conf != %{umingbuilddir}/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf ] - then - cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ - cd - - fi + install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ done for conf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ - cd - + install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ done # backward compat @@ -174,8 +163,7 @@ %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType %{umingfontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdiravail}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -202,8 +190,7 @@ %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO %dir %{ukaifontdir} %{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdiravail}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -215,7 +202,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-8.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages

by Bugzilla＠Mozilla

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #16 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc(a)ocallahan.org> 2008-10-28 18:03:07 PDT --- Stuart, can we get a review here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |pablo.martin-gomez@laposte. | |net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468580] New: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 Summary: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295106 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: sergey_feo(a)mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Excuse me for my bad English :-) Description of problem: The Liberation fonts are known to most people as "free" now. But license of Liberation fonts contain some restrictions that makes this fonts not free. Let's see to license of "liberation" fonts - paragraph 5 "Export control": "[...] As required by U.S. law, Client represents and warrants that it: (a) [...]; (b) is not located in a prohibited destination country [...] (currently Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) [...]". So, please think: Can we say that fonts with such license are free? Hyperbolic variant A: is the font that can not be legally used at California and Columbia free or not free? Hyperbolic variant B: is the font that can be used legally only at Moon free or not free? I understand that Redhat must not break U.S. laws. But it seems that license may not contains such things. Lets see what GNU/FSF writes about it - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html, paragraph below freedoms list: "Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere". And so - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#exportcontrol: "Sometimes government export control regulations and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to distribute copies of programs internationally. Software developers do not have the power to eliminate or override these restrictions, but what they can and must do is refuse to impose them as conditions of use of the program. In this way, the restrictions will not affect activities and people outside the jurisdictions of these governments." Please accept this GNU/FSF recommendation and exclude export limitations from license if it is possible. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download archive from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295106 2. Unpack 3. Read file "License.txt", paragraph 5 intently. Imagine that prohibited destination is you home or home of your friend. Actual results: Fonts is not really free. Expected results: Fonts should be free because it was included to Fedora to be free. Additional info: -none- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #14 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-28 13:20:15 EDT --- Some comments: 1- When you make a change, you increase the "Dist" number, not the "Version" one's. 2- Paste the following after the "%setup" for i in $(ls OldStandard*.ttf.sfd); do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old Standard TT/Old Standard SFD/' $i; done It's the renaming of the font just before the building. 3- A little improvement to the fontconfig rules, add the following : <alias binding="same"> <family>Old Standard</family> <accept> <family>Old Standard SFD</family> </accept> </alias> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-28 04:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Ah, weird. I could've sworn I saw it work on 64-bit. I don't have access to a > 64-bit box right now, but I will try it there again when I get to the office > tomorrow and report accordingly. I did run it on a x86_64 box (although against the upstream plugin on f9) and it works. I suspect it isn't something plugin specific but something to do with the gnome java accessibility bridge. Some setup on the reporters machine must trip it up. But if someone could replicate on a f10/rawhide x86_64 setup that would help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2008