fonts-bugs August 2010

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
295 discussions

[Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes
by hdu＠openoffice.org 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|50314,53223,69108,75472,79|50314,53223,69108,75472,79 is|037,80843,92203,93925,1050|037,80843,92203,93925,1050 |85,106815,110654 |85,106815,110654,113918 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Issue 105085] math: OpenSymbol font overhaul will require code changes
by hdu＠openoffice.org 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |113918 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct version of OpenSymbol
by hdu＠openoffice.org 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 ------- Additional comments from hdu(a)openoffice.org Wed Aug 18 08:18:24 +0000 2010 ------- *** Issue 113918 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616580 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de |paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-18 02:30:05 EDT --- This one is ready too. ䷣䷣䷣ APPROVED ䷣䷣䷣ You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING, this package is all yours now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

1 0

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616580 --- Comment #11 from Paul Flo Williams <paul(a)frixxon.co.uk> 2010-08-17 17:08:53 EDT --- Thank you Nicolas. I've changed the unzipping to plug the directory leak. I'll send the fontlint and coverage results upstream. Updated files: Spec: http://hisdeedsaredust.com/pkg/tlomt-junction-fonts.spec SRPM: http://hisdeedsaredust.com/pkg/tlomt-junction-fonts-2.0-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
by nmailhot＠openoffice.org 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot(a)openoffice.org Tue Aug 17 05:04:42 +0000 2010 ------- TEX fonts are a world in themselves and should not be taken as example of "good" fonts. TEX usually selects fonts by filename (in TEX macros) when other apps select fonts by the font name and font face exported in font metadata. As a result the font name and face exported by TEX fonts are too often a mess that does not conform to existing font standards (since TEX itself does not use them, except for very modern TEX engine which have low penetration so far). The Latin Modern example you give is typical: your table references the filename (which should be irrelevant, and besides is a human-unfriendly abbreviation that only makes sense for people that type it instead of selecting it in gui lists), and the faces listed do not conform to WWS (http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx). Standard CSS operators like bold-er can not work with a face such as "dunhill". (and I've seen much worse while auditing texlive 2007, for example standard face composants such as italic split between font family name and font family variant, which had clearly been generated through a stupid format convertor without ever checking the result outside of TEX) While it would be good to accommodate TEX fonts, the priority should be to accommodate fonts that conform to specs written to help typical GUI apps. If the TEX world wants its fonts to be used outside of TEX, it has lots of cleaning up to do. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 623995] Oriya (or-IN) fonts do not render correctly.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623995 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br, | |jreznik(a)redhat.com, | |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, | |ltinkl(a)redhat.com, | |rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, | |rnovacek(a)redhat.com, | |smparrish(a)gmail.com, | |than(a)redhat.com Component|lohit-oriya-fonts |qt AssignedTo|psatpute(a)redhat.com |than(a)redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-17 00:50:30 EDT --- need a fix from qt. moving component to qt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
by nathank＠openoffice.org 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from nathank(a)openoffice.org Tue Aug 17 00:51:57 +0000 2010 ------- Besides DejaVu's Condensed variants and ralphie's Adobe Garamond expert sets, perhaps another set of fonts useful for testing are the Latin Modern fonts. (See http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/latin-modern/ ; package lmodern on my Debian system.) For instance, here are the variants of the Latin Modern font "LMRoman10" and whether they are listed in the "Typeface" list in the Character dialog box in my OO 2.4 system: LMRoman10 listed in correctly font file variant OO font list? displayed? --------------------------------------------------------- lmr10 (roman) N - lmri10 italic Y Y lmro10 oblique N - lmu10 unslanted N - lmcsc10 smallcaps Y Y lmcsco10 smallcaps oblique Y Y lmdunh10 dunhill N - lmduno10 dunhill oblique N - lmb10 demi Y Y lmbo10 demi oblique Y Y lmbx10 bold Y Y lmbxi10 bold italic Y Y lmbxo10 bold oblique Y Y Interestingly, all the variants which OO lists are handled correctly, whereas the DejaVu Condensed variants are listed but not handled correctly (the non-condensed versions are used, as nomnex notes). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[smc-fonts/f14/master] * Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar@redhat.com> - 4.4.2 - apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch crea
by Naveen Kumar 16 Aug '10

16 Aug '10

commit 08c25a101645586109e42f53b387bbec8419c96e Author: Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> Date: Mon Aug 16 19:41:55 2010 +0530 * Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.2 - apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch created from Pravin S' src Modification - resolves bug #616324 smc-fonts.spec | 8 ++++++- smc-fonts_616324.patch | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/smc-fonts.spec b/smc-fonts.spec index 774ea6f..7b0b78b 100644 --- a/smc-fonts.spec +++ b/smc-fonts.spec @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPL+ @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Patch1: bug-545683.patch +Patch2: smc-fonts_616324.patch %description %common_desc @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ traditional Malayalam Scripts. %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-4.4 %patch1 -p1 cp %{SOURCE8} . +%patch2 -p1 %build make @@ -195,6 +197,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %doc ChangeLog %changelog +* Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.2 +- apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch created from Pravin S' src Modification +- resolves bug #616324 + * Thu Jul 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.1 - new release from upstream - changes in spec file to incorporate new build from sfd source diff --git a/smc-fonts_616324.patch b/smc-fonts_616324.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed38aa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/smc-fonts_616324.patch @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +diff -uNr malayalam-fonts-4.4/Meera/Meera.sfd malayalam-fonts-4.4_616324/Meera/Meera.sfd +--- malayalam-fonts-4.4/Meera/Meera.sfd 2010-07-14 20:51:08.000000000 +0530 ++++ malayalam-fonts-4.4_616324/Meera/Meera.sfd 2010-08-16 18:31:05.510460890 +0530 +@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ + OS2_WeightWidthSlopeOnly: 0 + OS2_UseTypoMetrics: 1 + CreationTime: 1201144287 +-ModificationTime: 1275976264 ++ModificationTime: 1281438003 + PfmFamily: 17 + TTFWeight: 400 + TTFWidth: 5 +@@ -60,7 +60,12 @@ + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'psts' Post Base Substitutions in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 5" {"'psts' Post Base Substitutions in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 5 subtable" } ['psts' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'haln' Halant Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 6" {"'haln' Halant Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 6 subtable" } ['haln' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'pstf' Post Base Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 7" {"'pstf' Post Base Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 7 subtable" } ['pstf' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] ++Lookup: 258 0 0 "'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0" {"'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0-1" } ['kern' ('DFLT' <'dflt' > 'latn' <'dflt' > 'mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + DEI: 91125 ++KernClass2: 2 2 "'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0-1" ++ 2 xx ++ 448 .null CR space exclam quotedbl numbersign dollar percent ampersand quotesingle parenleft parenright asterisk plus comma hyphen period slash zero one two three four five six seven eight nine colon semicolon less equal greater question at A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z bracketleft backslash bracketright asciicircum underscore grave a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z braceleft bar braceright asciitilde uni00AD ++ 0 {} 0 {} 0 {} 299 {} + TtTable: prep + PUSHW_1 + 511 +@@ -325,7 +330,7 @@ + DisplaySize: -48 + AntiAlias: 1 + FitToEm: 1 +-WinInfo: 48 24 10 ++WinInfo: 65975 25 13 + BeginChars: 66510 1154 + + StartChar: .notdef +@@ -2881,7 +2886,7 @@ + + StartChar: uni0D02 + Encoding: 3330 3330 100 +-Width: 567 ++Width: 595 + GlyphClass: 2 + Flags: W + LayerCount: 2 +@@ -2910,7 +2915,7 @@ + + StartChar: uni0D03 + Encoding: 3331 3331 101 +-Width: 376 ++Width: 387 + GlyphClass: 2 + Flags: W + LayerCount: 2

1 0

← Newer
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs August 2010