fonts-bugs August 2010

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
295 discussions

[smc-fonts] * Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar@redhat.com> - 4.4.2 - apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch crea
by Naveen Kumar 16 Aug '10

16 Aug '10

commit 5db3ddbaab848e27a5b12346ca9c7c88da8f2c52 Author: Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> Date: Mon Aug 16 18:47:35 2010 +0530 * Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.2 - apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch created from Pravin S' src Modification - resolves bug #616324 smc-fonts.spec | 8 ++++++- smc-fonts_616324.patch | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/smc-fonts.spec b/smc-fonts.spec index 774ea6f..0412350 100644 --- a/smc-fonts.spec +++ b/smc-fonts.spec @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPL+ @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Patch1: bug-545683.patch +Patch2: smc-fonts_616324.patch %description %common_desc @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ traditional Malayalam Scripts. %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-4.4 %patch1 -p1 cp %{SOURCE8} . +%patch2 -p1 %build make @@ -195,6 +197,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %doc ChangeLog %changelog +* Mon Aug 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.2 +- apply patch smc-fonts_616324.patch created from Pravin S' src Modification +- resolves bug #616324 + * Thu Jul 16 2010 Naveen Kumar <nkumar(a)redhat.com> - 4.4.1 - new release from upstream - changes in spec file to incorporate new build from sfd source diff --git a/smc-fonts_616324.patch b/smc-fonts_616324.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed38aa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/smc-fonts_616324.patch @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +diff -uNr malayalam-fonts-4.4/Meera/Meera.sfd malayalam-fonts-4.4_616324/Meera/Meera.sfd +--- malayalam-fonts-4.4/Meera/Meera.sfd 2010-07-14 20:51:08.000000000 +0530 ++++ malayalam-fonts-4.4_616324/Meera/Meera.sfd 2010-08-16 18:31:05.510460890 +0530 +@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ + OS2_WeightWidthSlopeOnly: 0 + OS2_UseTypoMetrics: 1 + CreationTime: 1201144287 +-ModificationTime: 1275976264 ++ModificationTime: 1281438003 + PfmFamily: 17 + TTFWeight: 400 + TTFWidth: 5 +@@ -60,7 +60,12 @@ + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'psts' Post Base Substitutions in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 5" {"'psts' Post Base Substitutions in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 5 subtable" } ['psts' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'haln' Halant Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 6" {"'haln' Halant Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 6 subtable" } ['haln' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + Lookup: 4 0 0 "'pstf' Post Base Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 7" {"'pstf' Post Base Forms in Malay+AQEA-lam lookup 7 subtable" } ['pstf' ('mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] ++Lookup: 258 0 0 "'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0" {"'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0-1" } ['kern' ('DFLT' <'dflt' > 'latn' <'dflt' > 'mlym' <'dflt' > ) ] + DEI: 91125 ++KernClass2: 2 2 "'kern' Horizontal Kerning lookup 0-1" ++ 2 xx ++ 448 .null CR space exclam quotedbl numbersign dollar percent ampersand quotesingle parenleft parenright asterisk plus comma hyphen period slash zero one two three four five six seven eight nine colon semicolon less equal greater question at A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z bracketleft backslash bracketright asciicircum underscore grave a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z braceleft bar braceright asciitilde uni00AD ++ 0 {} 0 {} 0 {} 299 {} + TtTable: prep + PUSHW_1 + 511 +@@ -325,7 +330,7 @@ + DisplaySize: -48 + AntiAlias: 1 + FitToEm: 1 +-WinInfo: 48 24 10 ++WinInfo: 65975 25 13 + BeginChars: 66510 1154 + + StartChar: .notdef +@@ -2881,7 +2886,7 @@ + + StartChar: uni0D02 + Encoding: 3330 3330 100 +-Width: 567 ++Width: 595 + GlyphClass: 2 + Flags: W + LayerCount: 2 +@@ -2910,7 +2915,7 @@ + + StartChar: uni0D03 + Encoding: 3331 3331 101 +-Width: 376 ++Width: 387 + GlyphClass: 2 + Flags: W + LayerCount: 2

1 0

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net) | Last Closed| |2010-08-15 12:02:32 --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-15 12:02:32 EDT --- Everything blocking is fixed indeed. Thanks for the awesome work cleaning up this mess! If you still have some cycles, I guess the Lucida naming is the worst remaining problem. But it's a font bug, not a packaging problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 521697] Change rpm autodeps command from fc-query to fc-scan
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521697 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-15 11:28:05 EDT --- Panu, I think that in F14 it's possible to move font autodep detection from rpm to other patckages. Would you be ok with moving this stuff in fontpackages-devel? (every font package in the distro depends on it) Can you give me some hints on how to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

1 0

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616580 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-15 07:02:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Spec: http://hisdeedsaredust.com/pkg/tlomt-junction-fonts.spec > SRPM: http://hisdeedsaredust.com/pkg/tlomt-junction-fonts-2.0-3.fc13.src.rpm Unfortunately, the zip file used has been created under OS X. Thus it leaks a __MACOSX/ directory on unzip. People writing mass-package check scripts have been known to complain about this directory. You need to unzip manually like the gfs packages do http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gfs-fleischman-fonts.git;a=blob;f=g… (unzip upstream says it should be handled in rpm, rpm upstream says it should be handled in unzip, and no one wants to fix OSX zip unzipping. Feel free to poke them some more.) The rest of the packaging seems sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 624201] Validation does not use XML catalog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624201 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-15 06:49:27 EDT --- After more testing, I can narrow the bug a little more xmllint --valid works with the system catalog if one is in the same directory as the tested file xmllint --valid foo.xml → OK xmllint --valid only fails if you try to validate a file in some other directory xmllint --valid bar/foo.xml → NOK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494902] New: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Aug '10

14 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc(a)googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 494158 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494158 +++ Description of problem: Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.8 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type the letters for కా ష్ with out the space between them in gedit (u+0c15,u+0c3E,u+0c37,u+0c4d,space(0x20) 2. 3. Actual results: కాష్ Expected results: కా ష్ (without intervening space ) Additional info: This is common part of telugu /Indian names consisting of Prakash. substitution should occur only for ka followed by viram and then sha This problem is present for Pothana2000 also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Aug '10

14 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616580 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntu-title-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Aug '10

14 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-08-14 07:58:53 EDT --- Anyway, ਔਔਔ APPROVED ਔਔਔ You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING, this package is all yours now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntu-title-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Aug '10

14 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs August 2010