[Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724
Summary: RFE: font merging
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core
multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback).
Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to
avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge)
For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though
from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family.
There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify
via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when
bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only
allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 3 months
[Bug 628540] New: Update to version 4.7
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update to version 4.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628540
Summary: Update to version 4.7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: mnowak(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
It seems Linux Libertine font was updated to 4.7.x-y version. Here comes the
changelog:
Changes to version 4.7.0 regular(-) & italic(/) & capitals (C) (20100430)
- All styles: Reported bugs fixed.
- Libertine regular:
- added missing anchors for i, idieresis, ccaron, scaron
- added missing characters accent uni0364 and glyph uni1D15
- completed combining accented chars block 0300-036F
-ij-Ligature more space between the glyphs, dot of j is slightly higher
-i,j,... more distinctive dotaccent and higher position
-r,f,j,y changes in the drop, which became more distinctive
- h slightl wider
- e slightly wider
- moved [a-z].superior from PUA to dedicated Unicode positions
- crossed form of W for new Wikipedia-logo
- Biolinum Bold: numerous improvements in following glyphs:
- a
- i, j, ä, ö, ü...
- w, v
- e
- f, ß
- c
- m, n
- b, d
- s
- kerning faults corrected
- numbers 0 - 9
- komma , hyphen -, numbersign #
- f
- A-Z slightly thinner verticals
- R, P better bows
- added small cyrillic m (uni043C) to Biolinum and some other missing cyrillics
(not yet all done...)
- Inverted Interrobang (uni2E18) added
- Add Substitution/Transposition brackets 2E02-0A
- macroncmb (uni0304) had a wrong positioned mark anchor and was thus flying
much to high
- Problems with Fractions (ID 2665656): without a contextual chaining
substitution fractions like 1/7 or 1/10, that don't have a concrete
Unicode-posistion, were unavailible. Now solved via contextual chaining
substitution.
- bold: ck, ch-ligature's part characters were a bit close. Now some more space
between them
- diacritic U+031A was wrongly placed. Is now being positioned above-right. New
anchor is called top_rechts
- corrected s_t-ligature in biolinum bold
Ingo Preuss points out thatsome glyphs were wrongly named:
- uni0237 is now called dotlessj (instead of uniF6BE, which was wrongly named
this way)
- all references to dotlessj now point to uni0237
In the following cases names were corrected, unicode points stayed unchanged
- tcommaaccent (uni0163) is now called tcedilla
- Tcommaaccent (uni0162) is now called Tcedilla
- uni021B is now called tcommaaccent
- uni021A is now called Tcommaaccent
- the locl-OpenType-substitution for Romanian wasn't changed, because it
already worked correctly
- orthogonal is now called uni221F
- sun is now called uni263C
- I had to move that .cap-variants of the accents to the PUA, because they
covered space where Unicode in between defined new characters. So I
systematically moved the .cap-Accents to:
grave.cap uni0358 -> uniE358
acute.cap uni0359 -> uniE359
circumflex.cap and so forth
caron.cap
breve.cap
hungarumlaut.cap
space_uni030F.cap
breveinvertedcmb.cap
breve.cyrcap 360
breve.cyr
dieresis.cap
hookabovecomb.cap
dotaccent.cap
(regular, italic)
- new point accent at uni0358
- new Mark for uni0358 in many O/o-characters
- improved support for POJ (Taiwan transcription)
- now kerning for kernclasspair p.sc + a.sc
- first use of contextual chaining substitution:
- when a combining accent follows an i, the dotlessi is used to prevent an
accent crash
- when one of the accented or leftwarding glyphs such as (ä, V) follow an f,
a short neck version of f (f.alt) is being used for optical reasons
- Added U+033B COMBINING SQUARE BELOW
- there was the "space" in a left kern class (together with dot, etc.). This
resulted in too few visible room when a "space" should seperate a word from the
now beginning quotation.
Italic: Correction of schwa
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 3 months
[Bug 608477] New: [abrt] crash in fontforge-20090923-3.fc13: FT_ConicTo: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash in fontforge-20090923-3.fc13: FT_ConicTo: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608477
Summary: [abrt] crash in fontforge-20090923-3.fc13: FT_ConicTo:
Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV)
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7572c1f049ba01fae8a094e8fb29f61fd2a7d747
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: flora.chatz(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: fontforge
component: fontforge
crash_function: FT_ConicTo
executable: /usr/bin/fontforge
global_uuid: 7572c1f049ba01fae8a094e8fb29f61fd2a7d747
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64
package: fontforge-20090923-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 3 months
[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts
accurately
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
collect incomplete info
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get a F11 or rawhide system
2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)")
3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort
4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
5. Let the applet run, check its result
Actual results:
The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and
does not use the same names at fontconfig
Expected results:
The same list in both cases
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 576105] New: [kn_IN] The space between close bracket and the character is very less
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kn_IN] The space between close bracket and the character is very less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576105
Summary: [kn_IN] The space between close bracket and the
character is very less
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-kannada-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: svenkate(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=401977)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=401977)
Shows the actual result
Description of problem:
In the text containing the Kannada text, space between close bracket and the
character is very less. Hence the close bracket appearing as merged with the
character. This usually happens in case of complex character.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-3
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login Kannada locale
2. Open gedit and copy paste the following text: ನೆರವಿಗಾಗಿ) ಭಾಗದಷ್ಟು)
ಫೆಡರಾಟ್ಸಿ)
3. Look at the space between the close bracket and the last character of each
word
Actual results:
The space between the close bracket and the text is very less
Expected results:
The space should be so that the bracket doesn't actually merge with text.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 477606] New: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpmlint
AssignedTo: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro, tmz(a)pobox.com,
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Our current font packaging policy requires the installation of TTF/OTF/PFA/PFB
fonts in a subdirectory of %_fontbasedir
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
Our general packaging policy demands of packagers to create proper font
packages when their app bundles them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
If an app or bit of code is not fontconfig-aware, it can always package
symlinks pointing to fonts packaged according to our guidelines in
%_fontbasedir space, and depend on the font package providing those files.
A recent audit run revealed that the number of packages bundling fonts is very
high. (repoquery found 159 packages shipping fonts in rawhide, the 2/3rds not
being font packages, see bug #477044)
In many case their packagers were not even aware they were bundling fonts (bug
#477406#c4). Some of them are licensing problems (477384#c4)
To prevent such problems in the future, rpmlint should flag any package that
installs ttf/otf/pfa/pfb fonts outside the %_fontbasedir tree, or bundle those
files with binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/lib?? and such.
Packages that include symlinks to files in the %_fontbasedir tree are ok,
though they should also get a warning so upstream adds fontconfig support to
its code (since it has near universal adoption and continuing to ignore
fontconfig will only add to the packager problems in the long run)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/34322/focus=34335
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 505764] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped
with a2ps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: file
AssignedTo: dnovotny(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, dnovotny(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are
"PostScript document text"
They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64
Full list:
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 534118] New: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534118
Summary: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: libXfont
AssignedTo: sandmann(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: zkabelac(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sandmann(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
While doing exit of Xorg - I'm getting this coredump:
#0 malloc_consolidate (av=<value optimized out>) at malloc.c:5136
#1 0x00007f2f45461fc8 in _int_free (av=0x7f2f4575ee80, p=0x32c2490,
have_lock=0) at malloc.c:5015
#2 0x00007f2f4770584c in FontFileFreeDir (dir=0x3291bb0) at fontdir.c:170
#3 0x00007f2f47707454 in FontFileFreeFPE (fpe=0x3291b40) at fontfile.c:144
#4 0x00007f2f477092c4 in CatalogueUnrefFPEs (fpe=<value optimized out>) at
catalogue.c:116
#5 0x00007f2f477099b8 in CatalogueFreeFPE (fpe=0x3280e60) at catalogue.c:272
#6 0x000000000042e4b6 in FreeFPE (fpe=0x3280e60) at dixfonts.c:225
#7 0x000000000042e507 in FreeFontPath (list=0x3280e30, n=4, force=1) at
dixfonts.c:1661
#8 0x000000000042e5c7 in FreeFonts () at dixfonts.c:2028
#9 0x0000000000421dc4 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value
optimized out>, envp=<value optimized out>) at main.c:32
I think it might be related to the latest Xfont upgrade.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libXfont-1.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.1-7.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. startx
2. do some work
3. kill X
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 519317] New: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317
Summary: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dchen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
I have done two clean installs of Fedora 11, x86_64 and i386 respectively.
Both are using "Traditional Chinese" during the install process and apply the
latest update after installation.
I take a look at the font size and DPI setting on both of them and they are the
same as listed below:
應用程式字型：Sans,10
文件字型： Sans,10
桌面字型： Sans,14
視窗標題字型：Sans Bold 10
固定寬度字型：Monospace 10
解析度：96 DPI
Then I open "gucharmap" and search the character "糓" (U+7CD4).
Change the font size to 12, 11 and 10.
The i386 version works quite well.
However, the display on the x86_64 one become messy.
And the following warning message appear on the terminal:
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 12', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 11', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 9.9990234375',
text='糔'
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always in x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open "gucharmap" and
2. search the character "糔" (U+7CD4).
3. Change the font size to 12, 11 and 10.
Actual results:
Display on the x86_64 one become messy.
And the following warning message appear on the terminal:
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 12', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 11', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 9.9990234375',
text='糔'
Expected results:
Character '糔' should be displayed properly without triggering Pango warning.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months