fonts-bugs August 2011

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
144 discussions

[Bug 677448] New: incompatibility/inefficiency with bitmap-fangsongti-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: incompatibility/inefficiency with bitmap-fangsongti-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677448 Summary: incompatibility/inefficiency with bitmap-fangsongti-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: bitmap-fangsongti-fonts causes fontconfig to exercise some very bad codepaths on upgrades. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.8.0 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Have bitmap-fangsongti-fonts installed 2. Be running a desktop 3. Do some upgrade that causes '/usr/bin/fc-cache /usr/share/fonts/bitmap' to run Actual results: Most every fontconfig app on the system (kde4d, notification area applets, gnome-settings-daemon, and others) suddenly start using 100% cpu. The fc-cache call takes a *very* long time to complete. Expected results: Not that. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 635961] New: [Pango][Cursoring][mr_IN] - Composed Character Deletion is wrong with DELETE Button
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Pango][Cursoring][mr_IN] - Composed Character Deletion is wrong with DELETE Button https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635961 Summary: [Pango][Cursoring][mr_IN] - Composed Character Deletion is wrong with DELETE Button Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, aalam(a)redhat.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 631761,635957 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In pango (tested it in gedit and firefox), the deletion with DELETE key, is not following the rule of deleting entire composed character with a single key press. It is deleting each of the character in a composed character, one by one. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.28.0-1.fc13.i686 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit or firefox in mr_IN locale 2. Activate ibus with CTRL+SPACE. Select marathi - Inscript 3. Type : kdk (which means consonant KA + Halant + Consonant KA) 4. Position the cursor at the beginning point of the composed character. 5. Now, press DELETE key. (It needs 3 key strokes to delete the whole character, but it should be done with a single key stroke in fact) Actual results: Delete composed character is happening in wrong manner. Actually it is now following the convention (Rule) of BACKSPACE, when deleting a composed character comes into picture. Expected results: It should delete the whole composed character in one DELETE key stroke when cursor positions at the start of the composed character. Additional info: OS : Fedora 13 Arch : i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 525866] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license Please rebuild the Fedora fonttool using those resources (packaged separately as they can be used by other packages) FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 708525] New: hinting turned off even for large fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: hinting turned off even for large fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708525 Summary: hinting turned off even for large fonts Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: pango AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: horsley1953(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Created attachment 501397 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=501397 Screen shot of office writer document with different size fonts in same families. Description of problem: On my fedora 15 system, the fonts all render terribly by default, being completely thin and spindly. After much investigation, I find various settings down in the /etc/fonts config files to do things like turn off hinting for fonts smaller than 7.5 (what units 7.5 are in, I'm not sure), but in fact hinting seems to be turned off for fonts up to point size 13 as the attached screenshot of a libreoffice document seems to show. So many pieces are involved in font rendering, I don't know for sure if pango is the right component for this, but it is my best guess. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.28.4-1.fc15.x86_64 cairo-1.10.2-3.fc15.x86_64 fontconfig-2.8.0-3.fc15.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.See screenshot of office writer image 2. 3. Actual results: All fonts 13 points and under rendered incredibly spindly. Expected results: Better font rendering. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 586214] New: knm-new-fixed-fonts isn't usable
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: knm-new-fixed-fonts isn't usable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586214 Summary: knm-new-fixed-fonts isn't usable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: knm-new-fixed-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: knm-new-fixed-fonts is capable for Japanese font though, it doesn't have enough glyph coverage for Japanese. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-11.fc13 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-match -v Fixed|grep -E " lang"|grep ja 2. 3. Actual results: No output Expected results: the lang spec should contains ja. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 485566] New: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: As you know, fontconfig finds proper fonts for text rendering, depending on locales of process and text to render. It works properly in the most cases, but there are some sever cases. For example, if you type only "@" or "}" in gedit, it uses glyph of VLGothic in Japanese locale. However, if you type "a" after the first character, it changes one's mind to choose glyphs of DejaVu fonts. It's very annoying for Japanese users. In the worst cases, the width of the indentations of sourcecode seems different. (As the width of the " " glyphs are differ between VLGothic and DejaVu) How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login X11 as a Japanese. 2. Open gedit and change the configuration to use "Monospace". 3. Type "@" on the first line, and "@a" on the first line. Actual results: "@" seems differ between the two lines. Expected results: "@" seems the same between the two lines. The same glyph should be used for rendering the two "@". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 29

[Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mcmonster(a)o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6 I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing (SCIM + Anthy) and displaying. The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and readable fonts. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Just try displaying any Japanese text. This is the update, that probably changed fonts: Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional ]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages vlgothic-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 installed vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 installed Available Packages VLGothic-fonts.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 477477] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 648143] New: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648143 Summary: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: apanov-heuristica-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.2.2 URL: http://code.google.com/p/evristika/downloads/list Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 499790] New: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB press Delete key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3. I think it is a regression bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C4D U+0C15 2.Press Delete key to delete the char 3. Actual results: It can't delete the whole char,it will delete part of the char Expected results: It will delete the whole char. Additional info: All of chars in [te_IN][GSUB] has the same problem. But in rhel 5.3 they work well. So I think it is a regression problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs August 2011