July 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |sundaram(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram(a)redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:35 EST ------- OK | MUST: rpmlint is clean OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package… Shouldn't the font directory name be consistent? Under /usr/share/docs it is gfs-nicecore-fonts and it is just called gfs-nicefore under /usr/share/fonts. I suppose that is a matter of taste since font packages don't seem to follow any particular convention here. OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package… OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines… OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved… OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must… OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build… OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed… OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST… OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations… OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package… OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane… APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |sundaram(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram(a)redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:27 EST ------- I would recommend following the standard template specified at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template It would ease the review process quite a bit if you follow that which is always a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram(a)redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:06 EST ------- Fix the rpmlint warnings. While the mixed tab and spacing warnings are less serious, the permissions are definitely wrong. srpm: thibault-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Essays1743-1.0-ttf.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Rockets-ttf.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission StayPuft.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Isabella.tar.gz 0777 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Spec file: thibault-fonts.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package… OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package… OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines… OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved… OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must… OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build… OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed… OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files NOK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Please fix the incorrect permissions OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST… OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations… OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package… OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane… Add a font config file as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template and in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|matt_domsch(a)dell.com |sundaram(a)redhat.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering

by mox＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox(a)openoffice.org Fri Jul 18 20:01:42 +0000 2008 ------- The work of this bug continues in cws cairocanvastext01. The cws now has working cairo canvas text for X11, Mac OS X/Quartz and (hopefully) Windows. The rendering is not 100% perfect, but several problems are actually due to VCL backends and/or canvas implementation, not the cairo text rendering. The internal VCL API is NOT exposed anymore. Instead, a platform independent glyph layout array + font id is passed to canvas, as described in vcl/inc/vcl/sysdata.hxx. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1

by Minto Joseph

Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6314 Added Files: padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add conf file --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <alias> <family>Padauk</family> <default> <family>sans-serif</family> </default> </alias> <alias> <family>sans-serif</family> <prefer> <family>Padauk</family> </prefer> </alias> </fontconfig>

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1

by Minto Joseph

Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6185 Added Files: padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add conf file --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <alias> <family>Padauk</family> <default> <family>sans-serif</family> </default> </alias> <alias> <family>sans-serif</family> <prefer> <family>Padauk</family> </prefer> </alias> </fontconfig>

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2008