January 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-04 11:07:01 EDT --- Hilariously, I can't upgrade yum (at least not with the rawhide repos enabled) to see if this is fixed already, for much the same reason: python abi change -> inkscape -> poppler -> openoffice -> fonts -> doom. I installed yum-3.2.20-5.fc10 from koji by hand, but it produces the same failure when trying to install rawhide python packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley(a)gmail.com Blocks| |182235 Depends on|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-04 10:55:40 EDT --- fixing dependencies as not to bring FE-LEGAL into F11Target :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-04 10:49:41 EDT --- See also http://fpaste.org/paste/694 So the basic update path just works, and something else must be confusing yum or pinning the old conflicting packages on ajax' system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 566515] New: Do not include font files in generated doc

by gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566515 doxygen | general | Ver: 1.5.7.1 Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc Product: doxygen Version: 1.5.7.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: dimitri(a)stack.nl ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot(a)LaPoste.net QAContact: dimitri(a)stack.nl CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified Doxygen adds font files to the documentation it generates. This pauses problems to distributions as fonts are bulky and can have conflicting legal constraints. Duplicating the same font files in every doxygen-produced documentation just exacerbates the problem. Please stop distributing fonts within doxygen, and let the system manage fonts for you. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402#c2 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566515.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477402, which changed state. Bug 477402 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Andy Shevchenko <andy(a)smile.org.ua> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Andy Shevchenko <andy(a)smile.org.ua> 2009-01-04 09:14:53 EDT --- As I described in [1] the jack-audio-connection-kit is a good package. Please, fix doxygen instead and feel reopen this bug lately. I can put then requirements of new doxygen package if you want to. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00117.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur(a)yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur@yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur(a)yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-04 06:20:33 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-... http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Im not too sure of line 53 : install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I dint quite get that. Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" so there must be something wrong in the "ln ... " command.. line 61. I havent been able to correct that either. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-04 05:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Domestic_manners is currently not on the wishlist - it is here > http://www.urbanfonts.com/fonts/Domestic_Manners.htm So just add a new entry in the wishlist, and package the font :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sven(a)lank.es) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-04 05:56:13 EDT --- Hi Sven, Thank you for this new font package! Dustimo is a neat font that suffers from a missing upstream. We'll accept it nevertheless, but please continue to try getting an upstream response even after the package integration (sfd sources, addition of the font exception to the license). Anyway: — Right now the best font source is probably Debian, as the font was created for this distribution. They have a more current dustimo.zip in their ttf-dustin package (20030318) — Please make separate sans and sans-serif subpackages using the multi template in fontpackages-devel — Please add fontconfig declarations to each subpackage. It's not difficult, just fill in the basic template in fontpackages-devel (you can ask for help on the list if you have a problem at some point) — you don't really need to add an archivename if its value is the same as fontname — please don't deviate from the template and use the provided macros or we'll have no end of problems lates ⇒ NEEDINFO till this is taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(ivazqueznet@gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-04 05:29:37 EDT --- Thank you for packaging a new font. Initial remarks: — you should convert to the new Fedora packaging templates. That will make Behdad happy and simplify your spec file quite a bit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template (plain text version in fontpackages-devel) — please use lowercase package name to keep consistency with other font packages such as dejavu-fonts — You have more complete fontconfig templates that just need filing in fontpackages-devel (please send them upstream for inclusion in the font archive when you're happy with them) — please ask upstream to add a detached txt license file, a readme and a fontlog. The OFL is quite specific about stuff like reserved font names, that require documentation in the license text and fontlog — this font is available in the Open Font Library. Please ask upstream what the canonical home should be. If it is the Open Font Library, add the oflb- prefix to the fontname — please add a page to the wiki that describes this font and will be referenced in the F11 release notes, using this template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template (see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle ) ⇒ NEEDINFO while this is being taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2009