January 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 478891] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo: fangqq(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fangqq(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' '*.ttc' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: — Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... — our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 477420] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 472635] New: Google Droid fonts specification

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Google Droid fonts specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Summary: Google Droid fonts specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: notting(a)redhat.com CC: katzj(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,446451 Classification: Fedora Google has released for quite a long time a high-quality set of "Droid" fonts as part of the Android platform. They have a high-visibility for average users because of all the Google press barrage. The-Eula-protected Android SDK has been superseded lately by a public source repository. http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=da... The NOTICE file in this directory is a Fedora-friendly Apache License. However the font metadata embedded in the files claims: « This font software is the valuable property of Ascender Corporation and/or its suppliers and its use by you is covered under the terms of a license agreement. This font software is licensed to you by Ascender Corporation for your personal or business use on up to five personal computers. You may not use this font software on more than five personal computers unless you have obtained a license from Ascender to do so. Except as specifically permitted by the license, you may not copy this font software. If you have any questions, please review the license agreement you received with this font software, and/or contact Ascender Corporation. Contact Information: Ascender Corporation Web http://www.ascendercorp.com/ » But Ascender will redirect you to Google, which is as usual silent. To check it, 1. download a raw TTF file 2. open it in Fontforge 3. -> Elements 4. -> Font Info 5. -> TTF Name 6. -> License (License URL is fun too) This has so far discouraged Fedora and Debian packaging, even though wild Droid packages have started to appear, people are incorporating Droid material in derivatives, and one of those may eventually make it in the repo without raising Legal bells. Thus I have two questions: 1. is the legal situation clear enough to allow Fedora packaging as is 2. since Google won't step down to replying to solicitations by mere mortals, can an official Fedora or Red Hat enquiry be made to clarify the situation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Bug 477479] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 477451] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: samyak-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange <palango(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange <palango(a)gmx.de> 2009-01-31 18:53:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vollkorn-fonts Short Description: A serif latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange <palango(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange <palango(a)gmx.de> 2009-01-31 18:51:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts Short Description: A serif decorative latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |palango(a)gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-31 15:48:39 EDT --- 1. You don't really need to specify the format in the summary 2. I'm quite sure that in all the German I can't read on the homepage and pdf there is some material to fatten up the description a bit. But, that's 100% nitpicking on my part. ⧆⧆⧆ APPROVED ⧆⧆⧆ And since you've proven twice you could read documentation and ask the right questions on the list, I'm also going to sponsor you. Please don't prove me wrong (as your sponsor I'm also here to help you should you have packaging problems later). You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging another Fedora font. It's a pleasure to do reviews where there is nothing really wrong, don't stop here :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3

by nim

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7944/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fix fontconfig links for sans and mono Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000 1.3 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/59-%{fontname}-serif.conf -for fontconf in 59-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ - 59-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ +for fontconf in 65-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ + 60-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-serif.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf @@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ %changelog +* Sat Jan 31 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> +- 1.0.112-4 +⬨ fix-up fontconfig installation for sans and mono + * Fri Jan 16 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.0.112-3 ⁉ Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232144541 +google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-4_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233428004

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2009