[Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-01-05 15:28:55 EDT ---
Hidden or not that does not change one bit the licensing considerations that
made FPC and FESCO adopt the aforementioned guidelines
Please adapt your package to them
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370
Jochen Schmitt <jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-05 15:02:35 EDT ---
Because the font file which was detected by your bot is a hidden file (dot
file) it makes not sense to create a seperate subpackage for the fonts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-01-05 09:57:20 EDT ---
So are you proposing:
moodle
moodle-fonts
<snip>
moodle-sm
moodle-sm-fonts
moodle-km
moodle-km-fonts
moodle-to
moodle-to-fonts
? This is acceptable to me, if that's what you mean.
Putting them all into one -fonts would mean that every installation would
require any language that included fonts, which is highly broken. Maybe I'm
misunderstanding.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months