[Bug 547532] New: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532
Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far
worse
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mattdm(a)mattdm.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
It's cool that the patent expiration lets us enable the bytecode interpreter.
However, there's a severe flaw -- if there's no bytecode, apparently freetype
doesn't hint at all.
I use Inconsolata as my terminal font, and it normally looks great. After the
update, it got all fuzzy and basically unusable. This is sadly true for a great
many very nice fonts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 501852] New: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D
U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press
backspace key need 14 times
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
DDescription of problem:
In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs
press 14 times
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW
CODE,press backspace key
Actual results:
It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char
Expected result:
It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 551317] New: A dash becomes a long empty space.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317
Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: psatya(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I have typed my Telugu text here using firefox browser
http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Telugu
and pasted it into OpenOffice Writer 3.1 with Lohit Telugu font version 2.4.5
selected.
Everything seem to be working fine though the newer Lohit font looks smaller
than an older version of Lohit font I was using earlier.
But the main problem here is, a dash (-) becomes an empty space. It looks like
a long space that is equivalent two chars approx.
I also tried to type a dash right in the OO but it doesn't work.
If I select Pothana2000 font instead of Lohit in OO, all my dashes work fine.
The Pothana2000 is another Unicode font for Telugu but I love the rounded
letter shapes of Lohit font so much!
Thanks a lot for this beautiful Lohit Telugu font.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
by bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724
Summary: RFE: font merging
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core
multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback).
Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to
avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge)
For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though
from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family.
There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify
via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when
bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only
allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts
accurately
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
collect incomplete info
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get a F11 or rawhide system
2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)")
3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort
4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
5. Let the applet run, check its result
Actual results:
The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and
does not use the same names at fontconfig
Expected results:
The same list in both cases
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 3 months
[Bug 477606] New: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpmlint
AssignedTo: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro, tmz(a)pobox.com,
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Our current font packaging policy requires the installation of TTF/OTF/PFA/PFB
fonts in a subdirectory of %_fontbasedir
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
Our general packaging policy demands of packagers to create proper font
packages when their app bundles them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
If an app or bit of code is not fontconfig-aware, it can always package
symlinks pointing to fonts packaged according to our guidelines in
%_fontbasedir space, and depend on the font package providing those files.
A recent audit run revealed that the number of packages bundling fonts is very
high. (repoquery found 159 packages shipping fonts in rawhide, the 2/3rds not
being font packages, see bug #477044)
In many case their packagers were not even aware they were bundling fonts (bug
#477406#c4). Some of them are licensing problems (477384#c4)
To prevent such problems in the future, rpmlint should flag any package that
installs ttf/otf/pfa/pfb fonts outside the %_fontbasedir tree, or bundle those
files with binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/lib?? and such.
Packages that include symlinks to files in the %_fontbasedir tree are ok,
though they should also get a warning so upstream adds fontconfig support to
its code (since it has near universal adoption and continuing to ignore
fontconfig will only add to the packager problems in the long run)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/34322/focus=34335
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 505764] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped
with a2ps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: file
AssignedTo: dnovotny(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, dnovotny(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are
"PostScript document text"
They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64
Full list:
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 534118] New: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534118
Summary: Coredump on exit from X Windows in FontFileFreeDir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: libXfont
AssignedTo: sandmann(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: zkabelac(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sandmann(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
While doing exit of Xorg - I'm getting this coredump:
#0 malloc_consolidate (av=<value optimized out>) at malloc.c:5136
#1 0x00007f2f45461fc8 in _int_free (av=0x7f2f4575ee80, p=0x32c2490,
have_lock=0) at malloc.c:5015
#2 0x00007f2f4770584c in FontFileFreeDir (dir=0x3291bb0) at fontdir.c:170
#3 0x00007f2f47707454 in FontFileFreeFPE (fpe=0x3291b40) at fontfile.c:144
#4 0x00007f2f477092c4 in CatalogueUnrefFPEs (fpe=<value optimized out>) at
catalogue.c:116
#5 0x00007f2f477099b8 in CatalogueFreeFPE (fpe=0x3280e60) at catalogue.c:272
#6 0x000000000042e4b6 in FreeFPE (fpe=0x3280e60) at dixfonts.c:225
#7 0x000000000042e507 in FreeFontPath (list=0x3280e30, n=4, force=1) at
dixfonts.c:1661
#8 0x000000000042e5c7 in FreeFonts () at dixfonts.c:2028
#9 0x0000000000421dc4 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value
optimized out>, envp=<value optimized out>) at main.c:32
I think it might be related to the latest Xfont upgrade.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libXfont-1.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.1-7.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. startx
2. do some work
3. kill X
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months