May 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 476951] New: missing dependencies of emacs: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: missing dependencies of emacs: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476951 Summary: missing dependencies of emacs: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dnovotny(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I got this mail today: emacs has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: 1:emacs-22.3-2.fc11.ppc requires xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi On x86_64: 1:emacs-22.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi On i386: 1:emacs-22.3-2.fc11.i386 requires xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi On ppc64: 1:emacs-22.3-2.fc11.ppc64 requires xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi Please resolve this as soon as possible. does this package not exist in rawhide anymore? or is it renamed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 491959] New: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491959 Summary: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-hebrew-fancy AssignedTo: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 477436] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: padauk-fonts AssignedTo: mvaliyav(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mvaliyav(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 437689] New: xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: 1. xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic contains fonts in a modern TTF/OTF format. Those fonts need to be exposed in /usr/share/fonts and not /usr/share/X11/fonts for more apps to take advantage of them 2. the package contains two versions of the same font (in OTF and TTF format). This is likely to confuse apps so either drop one or make two separate conflicting packages so they're never installed at the same time on the same system. The OTF file appears to be the most complete one based on its size so I'd drop the TTF one (true all our apps do not support OTF fonts yet but they are becoming common enough apps should be fixed and TTf versions needn't be provided as workaround) 3. The package only contains the Goha-Tibeb Zemen font. It would be more user-friendly if it was renamed goha-tibeb-zemen-fonts Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic-7.2-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

14 years, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support

by nmailhot＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 Issue #|96826 Summary|Add font autoinstallation support Component|framework Version|OOo 3.0 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|FEATURE Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|nmailhot ------- Additional comments from nmailhot(a)openoffice.org Wed Dec 3 08:35:00 +0000 2008 ------- The Linux platform is gaining an on-demand font autoinstallation framework (BSD and Solaris will probably follow eventually). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation OpenOffice.org should be plugged into it and use it to request the fonts its documents need. This would have a huge user impact, especially writer-side --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

14 years, 7 months

3
11
0 / 0

[Bug 481068] New: fc-cache install errors

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-cache install errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Summary: fc-cache install errors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: bitmap-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 446452 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When bitmap-fonts gets installed there are a bunch of fc-cache errors appearing in rawhide. bitmap-fonts needs to be updated to the latest packaging guidelines and macros. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bitmap-fonts-0.3-6.fc10 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. spin Live Actual results: Installing: bitmap-fonts ##################### [727/950]/usr/share/fonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/VLGothic: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/abyssinica: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/bitmap-fonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/jomolhari: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/kacst: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/khmeros: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lklug: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-bengali: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-gujarati: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-hindi: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-kannada: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-maithili: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-oriya: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-punjabi: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-tamil: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/mathml: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/padauk: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/paktype: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/stix: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/thaifonts-scalable: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/un-core: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType: failed to write cache error: %post(bitmap-fonts-0.3-6.fc10.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 32 Expected results: Should not fail with error 32 Additional info: Actual above errors are probably due to fontconfig error, but install should not fail anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
21
0 / 0

[Bug 461617] New: modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 Summary: modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=316191) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316191) Sample openoffice.org document with vertical text in this font Description of problem: OpenOffice.org documents using vertical text in Sazanami-Gothic show broken glyphs. The spec for this font says " # original is http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/efont/10087/sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 # due to Bug#196433, ttf has been modified and the tarball repacked Source0: sazanami-%{fontver}.tar.bz2 " if I locally revert to the original .tar.bz2 from http://iij.dl.sourceforge.jp/efont/10087/sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 then the rendering look right. See: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92671 for discussion about this, and the suggestion that the hacky editing of the font has gone awry. Attached is a sample document for use with Sazanami-Gothic installed, and screen shots of it with the modified fedora version, and a screen shot with the tarball reverted to the original upstream one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 490941] New: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. fc-match "times roman" 2. 3. Actual results: DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" Expected results: DejaVuSerif.ttf: "DejaVu Serif" "Book" Additional info: Perhaps this should be fixed in fontconfig as well? Clearly (to the user) any font name beginning with "times" should return a Serif font. eg: fc-match times fc-match "times roman" fc-match "times new roman" fc-match "times-roman" fc-match "times-new-roman" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 501683] New: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 with RAW CODE,it shows ക്ള Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D17 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2B U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2C U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2E U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D36 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D39 U+0D4D U+0D33 all have errors I will attach an attachment for error font and correct font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 501424] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344556) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344556) 0BB8-0BC1.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0BB8 U+0BC1 ஸு U+0BB9 U+0BC1 ஹு and they are different from the correct images. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC1.jpg and 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
10
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2009