[Bug 501422] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: xinsun(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=344553)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344553)
0BB8-0BC2.jpg
Description of problem:
When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit, the results were
wrong.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge
2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit.
Actual results:
The result are
U+0BB8 U+0BC2 ஸூ
U+0BB9 U+0BC2 ஹூ
and they are different from the correct images.
Expected results:
Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC2.jpg and 0BB9-0BC2.jpg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Bug 490373] New: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373
Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
We advocate building fonts from sources but do not do it for lohit which is a
Red Hat/Fedora font project.
Please make the lohit package generate fonts from sfds (as the dejavu people
showed, regular building from sources helps improve both fonts and font tools)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Bug 466404] New: Segmentation fault.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Segmentation fault.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404
Summary: Segmentation fault.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
$ gdb fontforge
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/fontforge
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008.
Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008.
[New Thread 0xb7fdf700 (LWP 11925)]
Help! Server claimed font
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
I may crash soon.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148, ds=0xbfffd144,
ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328
2328 *as = fontinfo->ascent;
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install e2fsprogs.i386 libICE.i386
libSM.i386 libXau.i386 libXcursor.i386 libXdmcp.i386 libXfixes.i386
libXrender.i386
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148,
ds=0xbfffd144, ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328
#1 0x004bb00c in GTextFieldFit () at gtextfield.c:2596
#2 _GTextFieldCreate (gt=0x83cc0a8, base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c,
data=0x83d0830, def=0x4fdf60) at gtextfield.c:2692
#3 0x004bb912 in GTextCompletionCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c,
data=0x83d0830) at gtextfield.c:2732
#4 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe5bc, data=0x0,
hcnt=1, vcnt=3, def_box=0x4fe440) at ghvbox.c:573
#5 0x004cb26d in GVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0x0, data=0x0)
at ghvbox.c:607
#6 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffe5b8)
at ggadgets.c:1172
#7 0x004834fa in GFileChooserCreateChildren () at gfilechooser.c:1525
#8 GFileChooserCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe818, data=0x0)
at gfilechooser.c:1571
#9 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0,
hcnt=1, vcnt=4, def_box=0x4fe400) at ghvbox.c:573
#10 0x004cb182 in GHVGroupCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0)
at ghvbox.c:633
#11 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffec14)
at ggadgets.c:1172
#12 0x0815b15e in FVOpenFont (title=0x81c20e0 "Open Font", defaultfile=0x0,
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
mult=1) at openfontdlg.c:736
#13 0x08109f84 in GetPostscriptFontName (dir=0x0, mult=1) at fontview.c:1102
#14 0x0810a1f4 in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:1142
#15 0x0819dbf4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff554) at startui.c:1131
$ dmesg | grep fontforge
fontforge[11659]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfe4b4a0 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
fontforge[11676]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfd76240 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
fontforge[11682]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfb3eb40 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20080828-1.fc10
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. $fontforge
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 478747] New: Do not include font files in generated doc
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478747
Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: doxygen
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
Doxygen adds font files to the documentation it generates. This pauses problems
to Fedora as fonts are bulky and can have conflicting legal constraints.
Duplicating the same font files in every doxygen-produced documentation just
exacerbates the problem.
Please stop distributing fonts within doxygen, and let the system manage fonts
for you.
See also bug #477402 and the referenced upstream bug
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 500304] New: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500304
Summary: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't
have right shape
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
In gedit input 09E2/09E3 with RAW CODE,the font
shape is not correct.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input 09E2/09E3 with RAW CODE
Actual results:
The font shape is not correct.
Expected result:
The font shape should be correct.
Additional info:
Please see the attachment of correct font and error font
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 468618] New: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618
Summary: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: un-core-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 438944
Classification: Fedora
While splitting font packages is generally good, separating regular and bold
faces of the same font in different packages is a tad over the top.
Please keep batang and batang bold in the same package (reiterate for other un
core fonts)
(at the same time, it's awesome you've managed to package a beast like the un
fonts given all the problems you had to solve)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: un-core-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months