[Bug 761445] New: impossibile to install package freetype devel
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: impossibile to install package freetype devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761445
Summary: impossibile to install package freetype devel
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: mkasik(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: giurrero(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem: I cannot install freetype devel
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
yum install freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64
Actual results:
Plugin abilitati:langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Impostazione processo di installazione
Risoluzione dipendenze
--> Esecuzione del controllo di transazione
---> Package freetype-devel.x86_64 0:2.4.6-3.fc16 will be installato
--> Elaborazione dipendenza: freetype = 2.4.6-3.fc16 per il pacchetto:
freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64
--> Esecuzione del controllo di transazione
---> Package freetype.i686 0:2.4.6-3.fc16 will be installato
--> Risoluzione delle dipendenze completata
Errore: Protected multilib versions: freetype-2.4.6-3.fc16.i686 !=
freetype-2.4.6-4.fc16.x86_64
Expected results:
Additional info: fedora 16 64 bit
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 782798] New: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782798
Summary: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: mclasen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dave.pawson(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
fc-query -i index /files/fonts/GFSBodoni.otf
produces a matrix of available glyphs. I found this to be inaccurate, when
compared with the output of fontforge, for the above file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig version 2.8.0
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. fc-query -i index /files/fonts/GFSBodoni.otf
2. inspect map
3. compare glyph list with fontforge output.
Actual results:
["0000",
"00000000","ffffffff","ffffffff","7fffffff","00000000","ffffdffe","ffffffff","ffffffff"],
["0001",
"ffffffff","feffffff","ffffffff","ffffffff","00040000","00818003","00000000","fc300000"],
["0002",
"03000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00040000","01850000","3f0000c0","00000008"],
["0003",
"00040200","00000008","00000000","44300000","ffffd7f0","fffffffb","44637fff","00000001"],
["0004",
"00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","000c0000","000000c0"],
["001e",
"00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","0000003f","ffffffff","ffffffff","03ffffff"],
["001f",
"3f3fffff","ffffffff","aaff3f3f","3fffffff","ffffffff","ffdfffff","efcfffdf","7fdcffff"],
["0020",
"7fff0bf4","560d0067","00000010","fff10000","00007fff","0000109e","00000000","00000000"],
["0021",
"00480020","00004044","fff80000","00000000","00200000","00000100","00000000","00000000"],
["0022",
"44068044","00000f80","00000120","00000033","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
["0023",
"00010000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
["0025",
"00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000c02","00008400","00000040"],
["00e0",
"00000000","00000000","00000070","00000800","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
["00f5",
"07fdffff","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
["00f6",
"00000000","fe000000","7fe30007","ffffe7fe","ffffffff","000c3fff","3001ce08","ffffff15"],
["00f7",
"00000000","83ff0052","00000000","07ffffff","00000000","81108102","00000000","ff7fffff"],
["00fb",
"0000001f","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
["00ff",
"00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","10000000"]
Expected results:
for U+E059 the map shows the glyph present. Fontforge and another app disagree
Additional info:
I believe I am interpreting the map correctly. I may be wrong.
My interpretation was confirmed on the fontconfig mailing list
Dave
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 781466] New: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781466
Summary: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: shubhadeepc(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
Hi, would be great if the lohit-fonts meta package is updated on fedorahosted.
Currently, it has v2.4.2 dating back to September 2009.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months