January 2012 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #61 from Kevin <mephisto(a)fastmail.net> 2012-01-23 00:27:27 EST --- I had composed a reply to an email message. As soon as I clicked "Send" Evolution crashed. backtrace_rating: 4 Package: evolution-3.2.2-1.fc16 OS Release: Fedora release 16 (Verne) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 761445] New: impossibile to install package freetype devel

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: impossibile to install package freetype devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761445 Summary: impossibile to install package freetype devel Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: freetype AssignedTo: mkasik(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: giurrero(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Description of problem: I cannot install freetype devel Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: yum install freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64 Actual results: Plugin abilitati:langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Impostazione processo di installazione Risoluzione dipendenze --> Esecuzione del controllo di transazione ---> Package freetype-devel.x86_64 0:2.4.6-3.fc16 will be installato --> Elaborazione dipendenza: freetype = 2.4.6-3.fc16 per il pacchetto: freetype-devel-2.4.6-3.fc16.x86_64 --> Esecuzione del controllo di transazione ---> Package freetype.i686 0:2.4.6-3.fc16 will be installato --> Risoluzione delle dipendenze completata Errore: Protected multilib versions: freetype-2.4.6-3.fc16.i686 != freetype-2.4.6-4.fc16.x86_64 Expected results: Additional info: fedora 16 64 bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #59 from Emmanuel Pacaud <emmanuel(a)gnome.org> 2012-01-19 14:16:34 EST --- Crash happened while I was moving an email from one folder ot another, in a IMAP+ account. backtrace_rating: 4 Package: evolution-3.2.2-1.fc16 OS Release: Fedora release 16 (Verne) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 715666] FTBFS gdpc-2.2.5-4.fc15 due to unknown type name

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715666 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2012-01-19 09:49:34 EST --- Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 782798] New: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782798 Summary: fc-query -i index produces inaccurate glyph map Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: mclasen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dave.pawson(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: fc-query -i index /files/fonts/GFSBodoni.otf produces a matrix of available glyphs. I found this to be inaccurate, when compared with the output of fontforge, for the above file. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig version 2.8.0 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. fc-query -i index /files/fonts/GFSBodoni.otf 2. inspect map 3. compare glyph list with fontforge output. Actual results: ["0000", "00000000","ffffffff","ffffffff","7fffffff","00000000","ffffdffe","ffffffff","ffffffff"], ["0001", "ffffffff","feffffff","ffffffff","ffffffff","00040000","00818003","00000000","fc300000"], ["0002", "03000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00040000","01850000","3f0000c0","00000008"], ["0003", "00040200","00000008","00000000","44300000","ffffd7f0","fffffffb","44637fff","00000001"], ["0004", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","000c0000","000000c0"], ["001e", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","0000003f","ffffffff","ffffffff","03ffffff"], ["001f", "3f3fffff","ffffffff","aaff3f3f","3fffffff","ffffffff","ffdfffff","efcfffdf","7fdcffff"], ["0020", "7fff0bf4","560d0067","00000010","fff10000","00007fff","0000109e","00000000","00000000"], ["0021", "00480020","00004044","fff80000","00000000","00200000","00000100","00000000","00000000"], ["0022", "44068044","00000f80","00000120","00000033","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], ["0023", "00010000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], ["0025", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000c02","00008400","00000040"], ["00e0", "00000000","00000000","00000070","00000800","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], ["00f5", "07fdffff","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], ["00f6", "00000000","fe000000","7fe30007","ffffe7fe","ffffffff","000c3fff","3001ce08","ffffff15"], ["00f7", "00000000","83ff0052","00000000","07ffffff","00000000","81108102","00000000","ff7fffff"], ["00fb", "0000001f","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], ["00ff", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","10000000"] Expected results: for U+E059 the map shows the glyph present. Fontforge and another app disagree Additional info: I believe I am interpreting the map correctly. I may be wrong. My interpretation was confirmed on the fontconfig mailing list Dave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[pkgdb] kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts ownership changed

by Fedora PackageDB

Package kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts in Fedora 15 is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[pkgdb] kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts ownership changed

by Fedora PackageDB

Package kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts in Fedora 16 is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[pkgdb] kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts ownership changed

by Fedora PackageDB

Package kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 781466] New: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781466 Summary: Update lohit-fonts meta package for version 2.5.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shubhadeepc(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Hi, would be great if the lohit-fonts meta package is updated on fedorahosted. Currently, it has v2.4.2 dating back to September 2009. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #57 from thomas.wuercher(a)hotmail.com 2012-01-16 11:55:44 EST --- Sent message. backtrace_rating: 4 Package: evolution-3.2.2-1.fc16 OS Release: Fedora release 16 (Verne) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2012