[Bug 680778] New: some important iso-10646-1 fonts unavailable
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: some important iso-10646-1 fonts unavailable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680778
Summary: some important iso-10646-1 fonts unavailable
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: noarch
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kurt(a)pinboard.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In Fedora 14, resizing of an xterm with CTRL-RightClick is not possible. Input
of Japanese characters do not show the glyphs on the xterm either.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-12.fc14.noarch
Linux FC-7250.hag.hilti.com 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 23 16:04:50
UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
How reproducible:
consistent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install Fedora 14 with X and xterm
2. remove ~/.Xdefaults and ~/.Xresources to make sure there are no user
overrides
3. login to the graphical desktop
4. open an xterm
5. CTRL-RightClick and select another font size
No instructions on how to input Japanese glyphs, as that problem is
automatically resolved when the first one is resolved.
Actual results:
1. font does not change
2. Japanese glyphs don't show
Expected results:
1. font does change
2. Japanese glyphs show
Additional info:
The error messages upon changing the font size (open an xterm from another
xterm to see the error messages; change the font size in the second xterm)
mention missing *iso-10646-1 fonts. Sample error messags:
> xterm: cannot load font -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--8-80-75-75-c-50-iso10646-1
> xterm: cannot load font -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--8-80-75-75-c-50-iso10646-1
> xterm: cannot load font -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--18-120-100-100-c-90-iso10646-1
With xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-12.fc14.noarch, there are fewer such fonts
(xlsfonts | grep 10646 | wc -l) than with the same package from Fedora 13.
Downgrading the xorg-x11-fonts-misc package to the version included with Fedora
13 fixes the problem.
cat <<__EOF__ >/etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.13.repo
[fedora13]
name=Fedora 13 - $basearch
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-13&arch...
enabled=0
metadata_expire=7d
gpgcheck=0
__EOF__
yum -y --enablerepo=fedora13 --nogpgcheck \
downgrade xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-9.fc12
Interestingly, doing an upgrade to the Fedora 14 package again after that, the
problem is gone. The set of files installed by the two versions of the RPM are
more or less identical. But checking the RPM scriptlets shows that the earlier
package uses mkfontdir and fc-cache in the postinstall/postuninstall
scriptlets, where the newer package uses xorg-x11-fonts-update-dirs. However
here I'm finally lost at what these commands actually do. But somebody more
knowledgable than me in this area should fix future versions of the package so
they work again as expected and make all the fonts available.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 11 months
[Bug 803563] New: lohit-telugu-fonts contains glyphs at erraneous code points
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: lohit-telugu-fonts contains glyphs at erraneous code points
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803563
Summary: lohit-telugu-fonts contains glyphs at erraneous code
points
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: lohit-telugu-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kamathvasudev(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
Lohit Telugu has a “square” glyph at the following code points, which for
instance render the minus sign and some halfwidth forms as squares when Lohit
Telugu is chosen as the main font.
* 0x0065 (U+2212)
* 0x0067 to 0x009A (U+FFBC to U+FFF2)
* 0x009D to 0x00A2
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5.1
Additional info:
Forwarding the bug from Debian Bugzilla [1]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663937
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 11 months
[Bug 18726] New: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18726
Summary: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Due to Han unification there is often a need for font distributors to test if a
font name is requested in a chinese, japanese or korean context. However, there
are many chinese locales and writing an exact match is not possible.
The current pattern (used by Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc) in this case is
<test compare="contains" name="lang">
<string>zh</string>
</test>
but we do not really want to match every locale containing "ze". We want to
match every ze-foo locale, not jze-foo or foo-ze
Please add a documented fonts.conf pattern to fontconfig that allows
distributors to specify such an exact match.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 12 months
[Bug 826145] New: double-quotes are scattered in titles in fonts-conf(5) manpage
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826145
Bug ID: 826145
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: low
Version: 17
Depends On: 826139
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Summary: double-quotes are scattered in titles in fonts-conf(5)
manpage
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: jvcelak(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Manual page fonts-conf(5) contains titles with double-quotes, but these are
escaped incorrectly and therefore shown wrong.
In fact, this is caused by a bug in docbook2man (#826139) I reported a minute
ago. Upstream ships the wrong manual pages and we do not regenerate it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.8.0-7.fc17.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. man 5 fonts-conf
2.
3.
Actual results:
...
<INCLUDE IGNORE_MISSING= NO">"
...
<PATELT NAME= PROPERTY">"
...
<MATCH TARGET= PATTERN">"
...
Expected results:
...
<INCLUDE IGNORE_MISSING="NO">
...
<PATELT NAME="PROPERTY">
...
<MATCH TARGET="PATTERN">
...
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 757985] New: need corrections in ur.orth file
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: need corrections in ur.orth file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757985
Summary: need corrections in ur.orth file
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, behdad(a)fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Created attachment 537790
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=537790
patch to fix urdu orth file
Description of problem:
We have recently packaged Urdu fonts from
http://www.crulp.org/software/localization.htm in Fedora. These fonts are
actively used for creating content in Urdu language from 5+ years.
fontconfig do not recognize them as complete font for urdu language due to
missing characters
U+0629 ARABIC LETTER TEH MARBUTA
U+0647 ARABIC LETTER HEH
I have got following response from upstream
" Alternate codes are recommended for Urdu
by Unicode standard itself (see the code-wise text explanation after
the code chart at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0600.pdf for
U+06C3 as an alternate to U+0629 and U+06BE (or U+06C1; depends on
which Heh one is referring to) as an alternate to U+0647)."
Page 5 In Arabic code U+0600 Unicode chart 6.0 gives
U+06C3 "ARABIC LETTER TEH MARBUTA GOAL, Urdu"
U+06BE "ARABIC LETTER HEH DOACHASHMEE, Urdu"
So,
U+06C3 is recommended by Unicode instead of U+0629
U+06BE is recommended by Unicode instead of U+0647
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.8.0-4.fc16.x86_64
How reproducible:
everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install nafees-*
2. fc-query /usr/share/fonts/nafees-naskh/Nafees\ Naskh\ v2.01.ttf
3. it gives lang: (s)
Actual results:
lang: (s)
Expected results:
lang: ur(s)
Additional info:
attached patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 826841] New: lilypond-emmentaler-fonts should be noarch
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826841
Bug ID: 826841
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
limburgher(a)gmail.com
Assignee: limburgher(a)gmail.com
Summary: lilypond-emmentaler-fonts should be noarch
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: lilypond
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
lilypond-emmentaler-fonts doesn't contain any arch-specific content. it should
be built as noarch.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lilypond-emmentaler-fonts-2.15.39-1.fc18.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 821957] New: Missing Requires(post) on grep and coreutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Missing Requires(post) on grep and coreutils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821957
Summary: Missing Requires(post) on grep and coreutils
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dsd(a)laptop.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
fontconfig's %post scripts use grep and mkdir but there is no listed dependency
on these programs.
When installing a system we are seeing that yum may decide to install
fontconfig before grep and coreutils, which will cause the post script to not
be run correctly.
Originally reported at http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11856
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 761409] New: please drop -tools subpackage for RHEL
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please drop -tools subpackage for RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Summary: please drop -tools subpackage for RHEL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontpackages
AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
I think on RHEL we don't need -tools subpackage.That pulls fedora-packager
package as a dependency also which is not available on RHEL.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 662869] faulty and mal-formated section 3 manpages
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662869
Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|needinfo?(ovasik(a)redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #9 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> ---
Debian/Ubuntu uses older version of docbook2man.pl conversion script. If it
works correctly on Ubuntu, there must be kind of regression between these two
versions. I will check that, as I will have to update docbook-utils anyway due
to other reported issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years