[Bug 1000691] New: Cardo font unusable, badly displayed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000691
Bug ID: 1000691
Summary: Cardo font unusable, badly displayed
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts
Severity: urgent
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rivocantus-local(a)gmx.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Font is badly displayed so that it is unreadable.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.045-4
How reproducible:
When used in Abiword or LibreOffice Writer.
Actual results:
In LibreOffice:
Letters are cut vertically. However when printed to pdf it becomes better.
In Abiword it creates very large vertical line on cursor, otherwise font
appears.
In both cases typing is very unpleasent. Which makes it difficult to
concentrate on the work.
Expected results:
Neatness. This font has a great potential.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NtyMEGwVgp&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years
[Bug 1118542] New: Rendering of Gurmukhi Script broken in QT (KDE application)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118542
Bug ID: 1118542
Summary: Rendering of Gurmukhi Script broken in QT (KDE
application)
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: lohit-gurmukhi-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aalam(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 917237
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=917237&action=edit
Screenshot for Kate and Gedit
Description of problem:
While Testing Fedora 21,Rendering Broken with latest Lohit Gurmukhi fonts in
KDE Applications (Only), while gnome/firefox is working as expected.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
qt-4.8.6-9.fc21.x86_64
harfbuzz-0.9.29-2.fc21.x86_64
gedit-3.13.2-1.fc21.x86_64
kate-4.13.2-2.fc21.x86_64
lohit-gurmukhi-fonts-2.91.0-3.fc21.noarch
How reproducible:
Every-time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Copy paste Test Case (ਕ੍ਰ) in gedit & kwrite
2. Both Renderings are different
3.
Actual results:
Rendering of text in GTK/QT are Different
Expected results:
GTK has correct rendering
Additional info:
default Punjabi fonts available in Fedora 21 are broken for KDE applications
(including lokalize)
Test Case
---
ਕ+ ੍ + ਹ = ਕ੍ਹ
ਕ+ ੍ +ਰ - ਕ੍ਰ
ਕ+ ੍ +ਵ = ਕ੍ਵ
----
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZsenOb1SaV&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 1 month
[Bug 981475] New: Improper glyph names in Lohit fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Bug ID: 981475
Summary: Improper glyph names in Lohit fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lohit-fonts
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: khaledhosny(a)eglug.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com
For purposes of text extraction from PDF files, glyphs should be named in
accordance with Adobe Glyph Naming convention
(http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/glyph.html). Most glyphs in
Lohit fonts follow this convention properly, but some do not. I did not do an
extensive review, but I noticed several occurances of glyph names like:
u0919_u094D.half_u0915_u094D.half.half
Which is wrong, since step 1 of the mapping algorithm in the above link will
drop the part of glyph name after the first occurence of a peroid, so only
u0919_u094D will remain which is assume is not what is wanted here. A proper
name would then be:
u0919_u094D_u0915_u094D.half.half.half
or something like that (the part after the peroid is completely ignored, so it
can be anything).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5cwcY7yhhr&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 1 month
[Bug 1173856] New: sil-lateef.metainfo.xml missing closing </p>
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173856
Bug ID: 1173856
Summary: sil-lateef.metainfo.xml missing closing </p>
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: sil-lateef-fonts
Assignee: hedayatv(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jbastian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hedayatv(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
gnome-software shows an error instead of available software updates:
failed to parse '/usr/share/appdata/sil-lateef.metainfo.xml': Error on line 13
char 17: Element 'description' was closed, but the currently open element is
'p'
And indeed, the closing </p> tag is missing from this file:
<description>
<p>
Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic
and
poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and
other
languages of the South Asian region.
</description>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-8.fc21.noarch
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. launch gnome-software
2. go to Updates tab
Actual results:
xml error
Expected results:
show the updates
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HzUlNm0hXJ&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 1 month
[Bug 1113968] New: Glyph for 0960 Devanagari Letter Vocalic RR should be corrected
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113968
Bug ID: 1113968
Summary: Glyph for 0960 Devanagari Letter Vocalic RR should be
corrected
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lohit-devanagari-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 912765
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=912765&action=edit
Replacement glyph and ODT/PDF demonstrating change
Description of problem:
Currently the glyph for 0960 Devanagari Letter Vocalic RR (double RR) in Lohit
Devanagari is similar to glyph for 090B Devanagari Letter Vocalic R (single R)
from Unicode Devanagari Chart http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0900.pdf.
Reference code chart for correct glyph of 0960. Please see attached PDF
document for comparison with Sanskrit 2003 and Windows XP Mangal font.
As seen in Unicode chart and other fonts, the correct glyph of 0960 should have
two hooks at bottom right to differentiate from 090B. 090B can either have one
hook as seen in code chart and other fonts, or just a belly with no hook at all
as seen in current Lohit Devanagari.
To be more clearer, while the glyph for 090B in code chart and other fonts is
shown with one hook, the form shown by current Lohit Devanagari for 090B is
also acceptable as a glyphic variant. However, the glyph variant of 090B with
one hook should not be used for 0960.
Hence the current glyph of 0960 in Lohit Devanagari should be corrected.
I have devised a replacement glyph for 0960 showing two hooks as per the code
chart as well as in line with other fonts. (Glyph for 090B need not be replaced
as the current glyph is an acceptable variant.)
Please replace the current Lohit Devanagari 0960 glyph with this new glyph.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=50TG3FKEwI&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 1 month
[Bug 1160371] New: OT suffix
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160371
Bug ID: 1160371
Summary: OT suffix
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: mozilla-fira-fonts
Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com
Reporter: schuster.bernhard(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, relrod(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The font is just called `Fira Sans` or `Fira Mono`, there is no such thing as
OT suffix.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Common templates i.e. for LaTeX expect the `Fira Sans` font and not `Fira Sans
OT` which causes major pain since the latex error reporting is not exactly
perfect calling for invalid font name containing spaces.
How reproducible:
Always.
All other distros I stumbled upon use the vanilla name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eyQwU6LNLp&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 1 month
[Bug 1074274] New: fontpackages installs macros files to /etc/rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074274
Bug ID: 1074274
Summary: fontpackages installs macros files to /etc/rpm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1074261
The proper location for rpm macros files in rpm >= 4.11 is
%{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d, please move them there from /etc/rpm.
If this package's specfile targets Fedora and EL >= 7 only, the
location for macro files can be simply changed from /etc/rpm to
%{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d. If it is intended to work on EL 5 and/or 6
as well, you can define a macros dir for example as follows (all on
one line) and install the macros to %{macrosdir}:
%global macrosdir %(d=%{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d; [ -d $d ] ||
d=%{_sysconfdir}/rpm; echo $d)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074261
[Bug 1074261] macro files install dir tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y5XgDFjunb&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 2 months
[Bug 882267] New: Warning about /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882267
Bug ID: 882267
Summary: Warning about /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: fontconfig
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: mefoster(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
Running appes such as gvim under KDE results in a warning to STDERR like this:
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading
configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.10.2-1.fc18.x86_64
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run "gvim"
Actual results:
Warning
Expected results:
No warning
Additional info:
I don't know if it's relevant that I use KDE as a desktop environment and that
this error comes up with gvim, but that's where I specifically noticed it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 2 months