fonts-bugs July 2015

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
199 discussions

[Bug 1229213] New: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Telugu for recent Unicode additions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Sep '15

06 Sep '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229213 Bug ID: 1229213 Summary: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Telugu for recent Unicode additions Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: lohit-telugu-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1036267 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1036267&action=edit Telugu LLLA and RRRA with vowel sign ligatures Unicode 7.0 encoded 0C34 Telugu Letter LLLA and Unicode 8.0 includes 0C5A Telugu Letter RRRA. I was one of the authors of the original proposals for these characters. I have attached glyphs for these characters including those of the consonant ligating with the vowels (except for U/UU and vocalic vowels since these can be presented as simple sequences of glyphs and AI since it is based on the glyph for E). Please add these to Lohit Telugu and the appropriate OT table entries for the vowel sign substitutions. NOTE: I am proposing a few more characters for Telugu for Vedic. Once Unicode approves I'll attach those glyphs also here. References: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0C00.pdf http://www.unicode.org/Public/8.0.0/charts/blocks/U0C00.pdf http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12015-telugu-llla-proposal.pdf http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12016-telugu-rrra-proposal.pdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eHaUm9j7X9&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 1156554] New: [rfe] use dnf instead of yum
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '15

26 Aug '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156554 Bug ID: 1156554 Summary: [rfe] use dnf instead of yum Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontpackages Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: metherid(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Fedora 22 is planning to switch over to dnf from yum as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF Please switch from yum/yum-utils to dnf/dnf-plugins-core. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YeSQAkWFuc&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 10

[Bug 477387] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Aug '15

21 Aug '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-hebrew-fancy AssignedTo: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1242549] New: ttx execution failed with traceback
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242549 Bug ID: 1242549 Summary: ttx execution failed with traceback Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ttx", line 6, in <module> ttx.main(sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 310, in main process(jobs, options) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 295, in process action(input, output, options) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 216, in ttCompile ttf.importXML(input, quiet=options.quiet) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 340, in importXML reader.read() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/misc/xmlReader.py", line 30, in read self._parseFile(file) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/misc/xmlReader.py", line 49, in _parseFile parser.Parse(chunk, 0) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/misc/xmlReader.py", line 82, in _startElementHandler elif "ERROR" in attrs or ('raw' in attrs and safeEval(attrs['raw'])): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/misc/textTools.py", line 11, in safeEval return eval(data, {"__builtins__":{}}) File "<string>", line 1, in <module> NameError: name 'True' is not defined Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonttools-2.5-2.fc22 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.ttx anyfont.ttx 2. 3. Actual results: above traceback Expected results: should not give traceback Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jMlRmqs6ZH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1241698] New: please add lato-fonts epel package
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '15

08 Aug '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241698 Bug ID: 1241698 Summary: please add lato-fonts epel package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lato-fonts Assignee: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com Reporter: piotr1212(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com I need lato-fonts as dep in epel 6 and 7. Please approve my acl requests and branch request in pkgdb so I can build it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ODUTx7lYDX&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 800607] CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

1 0

[Bug 800604] CVE-2012-1142 freetype: incorrect computation of number of glyphs in FNT_Face_Init() for FNT/FON files (#35659)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

1 0

[Bug 800602] CVE-2012-1141 freetype: BDF parser _bdf_list_split() fails to properly initialize field array (#35658)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

1 0

[Bug 800598] CVE-2012-1139 freetype: data buffer underflow in BDF parser _bdf_parse_glyphs() (#35656)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

1 0

[Bug 800600] CVE-2012-1140 freetype: multiple buffer over-read in PS parser conversion functions (#35657)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
20
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2015