April 2018 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2018-04-26 19:23:17 --- Comment #5 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- Closing, since google-android-emoji-fonts is no-longer installed by default. I've also added a note in the description directing potential users towards Noto Emoji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1532523] New: [google-droid-fonts] rebase to latest version

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532523 Bug ID: 1532523 Summary: [google-droid-fonts] rebase to latest version Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: google-droid-fonts Keywords: Improvement, Rebase Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: dkaspar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Description of problem: Currently we are using outdated font versions (of google-droid-fonts) in Fedora. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-droid-fonts-20120715-12.fc27 Expected results: I would hereby like to request a rebase to latest version of google-droid-fonts. Additional info: One of these fonts (DroidSansFallback.ttf) in the package is necessary for Ghostscript to function correctly when rendering CJK glyphs. And according to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines packages are forbidden to bundle fonts inside them, therefore I am using the google-droid-fonts package. But it's content is way older than what Ghostscript currently needs. NOTE: In case none of the maintainers is currently available, I'm able and willing to do this rebase myself (I'm already maintainer of urw-base35-fonts) to help you. You would just have to set commit right for me in the Pagure (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-droid-fonts). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1515436] New: gnome-shell crashes with attached stacktrace: FcConfigEvaluate at top of stack.

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515436 Bug ID: 1515436 Summary: gnome-shell crashes with attached stacktrace: FcConfigEvaluate at top of stack. Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: fontconfig Severity: high Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: ndokos(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1356104 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1356104&action=edit stacktrace of gnome-shell crash. Description of problem: I run Fedora 26 on a Lenovo Thinkpad W541. I ran a "dnf update" last Friday (2017-11-17) and after the update I could not login with any Gnome choice: Gnome, Gnome Classic, or Gnome on X11 - after a couple of burps on the display, it would return to the login prompt. I installed the cinnamon desktop and was able to log in with that. It turns out that gnome-shell crashes in FcConfigEvaluate - see attached stacktrace. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig.x86_64 2.12.6-4.fc26 @updates How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf update 2. reboot 3. login Actual results: Churn a bit and then return to the login screen. Expected results: Successful login. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1474257] New: fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474257 Bug ID: 1474257 Summary: fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1468978 Description of problem: On 64bit env, there are no way to generate {be,le}32d{4,8} caches unless removing 64bit version of packages because the 32bit version of fc-cache binary is hidden by the package manager. need to have separate binary to address like gtk does. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468978 [Bug 1468978] fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1566762] New: Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'translate'...

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566762 Bug ID: 1566762 Summary: Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/fonts.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'translate'... Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When I upgraded to Fedora 28, this was in the scriptlet logs: Fontconfig error: Cannot load config file from /etc/fonts/fonts.conf Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf", line 5: invalid attribute 'selector' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf", line 5: invalid attribute 'translate' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'version' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'xmlns:its' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 5: invalid attribute 'selector' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 5: invalid attribute 'translate' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'version' Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 6: invalid attribute 'xmlns:its' ... snip (a lot more) It appears now and then, for example with jupyter notebook Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.0-3.fc28 How reproducible: easy (but there mind be an easier way) Steps to Reproduce: 1. $ sudo dnf install python3-notebook 2. $ python3 -m notebook Actual results: the above warnings and errors are in the output in terminal Expected results: no warnings, no errors -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1450802] New: @sinhala-suppport group: please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450802 Bug ID: 1450802 Summary: @sinhala-suppport group: please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: low Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: harshula(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com [This BZ should be filed against the @sinhala-support group.] Description of problem: Please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto for the Sinhala script. The LKLUG font is viewed as deprecated and we've been trying to encourage other fonts that can succeed as the default Sinhala font on GNU/Linux. At this stage the Noto Sinhala range, in fonts-noto-hinted, is a more appropriate default font than LKLUG. See the discussion here: http://sourceforge.net/p/sinhala/mailman/message/34481529/ See Debian Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837969 Thanks, # -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 1556575] New: fontmatrix: FTBFS in F28

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556575 Bug ID: 1556575 Summary: fontmatrix: FTBFS in F28 Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: fontmatrix Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1555378 Your package fontmatrix failed to build from source in current F28. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25026974 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555378 [Bug 1555378] (F28FTBFS) Fedora 28 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1551221] New: iso8859-2-100dpi-fonts fonts.alias wrongly claims the fonts are scalable

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551221 Bug ID: 1551221 Summary: iso8859-2-100dpi-fonts fonts.alias wrongly claims the fonts are scalable Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: iso8859-2-fonts Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: hdegoede(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com /usr/share/fonts/iso8859-2/100dpi/fonts.alias contains entries like: -adobe-utopia-regular-i-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-2 -biznet-chimera-regular-i-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-2 -adobe-utopia-regular-r-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-2 -biznet-chimera-regular-r-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-2 etc. These entries, with a "0" after the "--" cause apps to think that scalable versions of these fonts are available, but the fonts installed by iso8859-2-100dpi-fonts are not scalable at all. This has caused my a great deal of problems while debugging bug 1523624. Please remove the entries with "--0" in them from the fonts.alias file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1445925] [abrt] gimp: pango_ot_info_list_scripts(): gimp-2.8 killed by SIGSEGV

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445925 Satyabrata Maitra <smaitra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1563434] New: fonttools-3.25.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563434 Bug ID: 1563434 Summary: fonttools-3.25.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.25.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.24.2-1.fc29 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs April 2018