https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284215
--- Comment #4 from Hin-Tak Leung <htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net> ---
The bottom line is, if they have authorization to modify and re-distribute a
microsoft font, they probably should remove the microsoft digital signature; if
they are not microsoft and ships with a font with a microsoft signature, that's
highly suspicious.
One way of confirming copyright violation is to find the same digital digest on
a genuine microsoft font. At the moment all I can tell is that the digital
signature was signed around 2002/2003, so if this is a copyright violation, it
would be a microsoft font shipped around that time, ie. windows XP-ish?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iin26ZecN5&a=cc_unsubscribe