Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679030
--- Comment #9 from Joachim Namislow <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2011-02-22 08:17:21 EST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I don't think that first screenshot really shows the body text
with the
bytecode interpreter enabled. It's rendered exactly the same as the third
screenshot.
Maybe you have a second look and convince yourself first that there exist 2 x 2
= 4 combinations (with and w/o BCI; with and w/o web core fonts) which
correspond to the 4 (different (!)) attached screenshots. If you wonder that
the text body of screenshots 1 and 3 look the same then you should also look at
the URL bar which undeniably shows a clear difference in the way the default
sans serif text is rendered. I can hardly imagine that while BCI is used for
rendering GTK widgets it is not by Xulrunner. As a matter of fact, button
labels in case 3 without active bytecode interpreter looks clearly better (in
my opinion). Case 1 reminds me of older Ubuntu releases which always suffered
from too skinny characters.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.