[Bug 563409] New: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to
Baekmuk Gulim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Summary: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from
DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: un-core-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, jks(a)iname.com,
besfahbo(a)redhat.com, mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se,
edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
smallvil(a)get9.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 546490
Blocks: 507684
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 546490
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #546490 +++
Description of problem:
I did a yum update and discovered emacs was using the Baekmuk Gulim font. Code
editing needs to be done in a fixed-width font! Baekmuk Gulim is not
fixed-width. Directory listings look horrible because the fields are not
aligned. I changed my emacs settings back and everything is fine for me now,
but I bet a bunch of people will have no idea what font to change back to. I
was only able to figure it out because I had an emacs running from before the
yum update.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.8.0-1.fc11.x86_64
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2009-12-14 03:52:56 EST ---
This issue is easily reproducible with fc-match "monospace:lang=en" though,
there are two things introduced in 2.8.0:
1. the above command matches lang="ko" too
2. Baekmuk Gulim has been added to the pattern with the strong binding somehow.
which has ever been added with the weak binding.
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2010-02-02 06:26:00 EST ---
This might be the configuration file issue in 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf. as I
pointed out current behaviour in the list [*1] and due to the issue we have in
Bug#518161 too perhaps dunno, comparing the lang with 'ko' behaves wrongly in
current implementation of fontconfig at least. modifying like the following
works expectedly:
<test name="lang">
<string>ko-kr</string>
</test>
FYI
*1 - http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2009-November/003275.html
--- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2010-02-02 11:42:55 EST ---
Behdad said he would look into the lang= issues but
maybe we should reassign to baekmuk-ttf at least as
a workaround for f13?
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2010-02-02 23:01:07 EST ---
maybe. we could clone this to keep both on track.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.