Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568245
Takanori MATSUURA t.matsuu@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(t.matsuu@gmail.co | |m) |
--- Comment #3 from Takanori MATSUURA t.matsuu@gmail.com 2010-03-05 10:56:55 EST --- Created an attachment (id=398075) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398075) Screenshot of IPA and IPAex fonts
Hmm. I got no email for this bug in 2010-02-25.
(In reply to comment #1)
Assuming s/sans-serif/serif/.
Oops. Thanks.
it's well-known that Mincho type face is compatible with serif.
I basically agree. But I think ipa-pmincho (and/or ipaex-mihcno) is better for serif in IPA and IPAex fonts family.
If you say ipa-mincho should be keep in serif, ipa-gothic should be in sans-serif which is set in monospace. I suppose ipa-gothic font also belongs to monospaced font because both ipa-mincho and ipa-gothic have same font width.
I suggest: 65-ipa-gothic (monospace) 65-ipa-mincho (monospace) 65-ipa-pgothic (sans-serif) 65-ipa-pmincho (serif) 65-ipaex-gothic (sans-serif) 65-ipaex-mincho (serif)