Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-09-26 12:18:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a problem for Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as freetype has it fixed).
Yes. I'm also thinking of pointing Spot to this mess, as those files seems duplicated pretty much everywhere, and this is the kind of cleanup op he did before
There's also a hit for afii64937 inside src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess it'll also need to show up somewhere in "supporting documentation" to really comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.)
I suppose the clean solution would be to make it process a canonical copy of the data at build time (that will make the licensing appear in rpm deps checks, and make sure QT uses the same values as others). Dunno about the licensing patch. To be honest my primary interest is to make sure all our software uses the same values, and the legal angle is just here to make people interested