rawhide report: 20090423 changes
by Fedora compose checker
Compose started at Thu Apr 23 06:15:04 UTC 2009
New package perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check
Wrap OP check callbacks
New package perl-Test-Aggregate
Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster
New package photoprint
Utility for printing digital photographs
New package python-arm4
Application Reponse Measurement (ARM) V4 Python language bindings
Updated Packages:
deltarpm-3.4-16.fc11
--------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter(a)gmail.com> - 3.4-16
- Split drpmsync into a separate subpackage (#489231)
desktop-backgrounds-9.0.0-8
---------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> - 9.0.0-8
- fix compat subpackage
erlang-R12B-5.7.fc11
--------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Debarshi Ray <rishi(a)fedoraproject.org> R12B-5.7
- Updated rpath patch.
- Fixed configure to respect $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
fedora-logos-11.0.4-1.fc11
--------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 11.0.3-1
- update to 11.0.3, adds KDE splash
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 11.0.4-1
- update to 11.0.4, fix art to actually be in leonidas theme
gdm-2.26.1-3.fc11
-----------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> - 1:2.26.1-3
- Add temporary hack to smack down misbehaving PAM modules
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> - 1:2.26.1-2
- Stop inactive pam conversations when one succeeds.
Should fix bug 496234
globus-common-10.2-3.fc11
-------------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se> - 10.2-3
- Put GLOBUS_LICENSE file in extracted source tarball
* Thu Apr 16 2009 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se> - 10.2-2
- Remove config.guess file
gnome-power-manager-2.26.0-2.fc11
---------------------------------
* Sat Apr 18 2009 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> - 2.26.0-2
- Fix broken battery capacity percentage reporting
gnomint-0.9.1-3.fc11
--------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Adam Huffman <bloch(a)verdurin.com> - 0.9.1-3
- fix for bug 496518 - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used
javasqlite-20090409-3.fc11
--------------------------
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 20090409-3
- Disable extension loading due to security concerns.
leonidas-kde-theme-0.2.2-4.fc11
-------------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> 0.2.2-4
- our own logos for both fedora and generic version
libatasmart-0.12-2.fc11
-----------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Lennart Poettering <lpoetter(a)redhat.com> 0.12-2
- Properly handle some ST and FUJITSU drive attributes. (rhbz 496087, 497107)
libchewing-0.3.2-8.fc11
-----------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat dot com> - 0.3.2-8
- Fix [Bug 496968] - libchewing-debuginfo does not contain sources.
pulseaudio-0.9.15-11.fc11
-------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 0.9.15-11
- Bug #497214
Do not start pulseaudio daemon if PULSE_SERVER directs pulse elsewhere.
tsclient-2.0.2-3.fc11
---------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.2-3
- Fix some wrong ids in the glade file to make the ui work (#485976)
wesnoth-1.6.1-2.fc11
--------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Debarshi Ray <rishi(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.6.1-2
- Respect $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, BZ 496897.
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.12-31.20090421git47bb00f.fc11
------------------------------------------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Ben Skeggs <bskeggs(a)redhat.com> 0.0.12-30.20090421git47bb00f
- fix for rh#489101
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Ben Skeggs <bskeggs(a)redhat.com> 0.0.12-31.20090421git47bb00f
- fix for rh#496559
Summary:
Added Packages: 4
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 16
Broken deps for i386
----------------------------------------------------------
gnome-desktop-sharp-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 requires libnautilus-burn.so.4
gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 requires libnautilus-burn.so.4
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.i386 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libssl.so.7
Broken deps for x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------
gnome-desktop-sharp-2.26.0-1.fc11.x86_64 requires libnautilus-burn.so.4()(64bit)
gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner-2.26.0-1.fc11.x86_64 requires libnautilus-burn.so.4()(64bit)
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libssl.so.7()(64bit)
Broken deps for ppc
----------------------------------------------------------
fedora-ksplice-0.5-3.fc11.noarch requires ksplice
gnome-desktop-sharp-2.26.0-1.fc11.ppc requires libnautilus-burn.so.4
gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner-2.26.0-1.fc11.ppc requires libnautilus-burn.so.4
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libssl.so.7
Broken deps for ppc64
----------------------------------------------------------
cabal2spec-0.12-1.fc11.noarch requires ghc > 0:6.10.1-7
fedora-ksplice-0.5-3.fc11.noarch requires ksplice
gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner-2.26.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires libnautilus-burn.so.4()(64bit)
kimono-4.2.2-5.fc11.ppc64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
kimono-4.2.2-5.fc11.ppc64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
qyoto-devel-4.2.2-5.fc11.ppc64 requires mono-devel
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libssl.so.7()(64bit)
sublib-0.9-4.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
sublib-0.9-4.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
15 years, 1 month
IBUS - Sorry
by Steven James Drinnan
Just had another look at ibus. Good to quick is there with alot more
input method.
15 years, 1 month
Use bash patchlevel as part of RPM version?
by Roman Rakus
Hi,
There is a bug (#496780) requesting to use patchlevel of bash as part of
RPM version. So today bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 would be
bash-4.0.16-6.fc11.i586. What do you think about it? Could it break
anything?
RR
15 years, 1 month
Is there an upgrade path from 32-bit to 64-bit?
by Gerry Reno
We're finally getting rid of the last of our 32-bit hardware and now we
would like to migrate all machines over to 64-bit. I explored this
migration idea a couple years ago on the mailing lists and basically the
answer was - don't know. The few who had tried said that the ended up
with a running system but that it had some weird quirks every now and
then. Has anyone managed to successfully migrate a system from 32-bit
to 64-bit using either anaconda upgrade or yum upgrade without ending up
with a lot of quirks? Is there some recipe for doing this successfully?
Regards,
Gerry
15 years, 1 month
packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11
by Bill Nottingham
The following packages have yet to be built in dist-f11, meaning they
haven't been rebuilt with the new compiler, they have not been built
with the new RPM hashes, and so on.
While we don't want to cause disruption, we would like to see these
fixed if reasonably possible.
Owner Package
===== =======
athimm libFoundation
awjb polyxmass-bin
behdad preload
clumens elilo
cweyl perl-RRD-Simple
dbhole velocity
dchen reciteword
devrim classpathx-jaf
edhill scrip
ertzing MyPasswordSafe
fnasser geronimo-specs
fnasser jakarta-commons-el
gemi oorexx
gemi smarteiffel
ghenry Sprog
green ws-commons-util
huzaifas labrea
huzaifas libtar
ivazquez xmlcopyeditor
jcollie libresample
jnovy compat-db
joost fpc
jpye fityk
jtulach javahelp2
kurzawa incollector
llim redhat-lsb
mgarski xscorch
mwringe jline
mwringe modello
mwringe msv
mwringe xdoclet
nsantos ws-jaxme
olea htmlparser
orphan klear
pcheung axis
pcheung castor
pcheung tagsoup
pfj boo
pingou R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2
pingou R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51
pingou R-hgu95av2probe
pmachata flex
rakesh coredumper
rezso libgeotiff
sindrepb cowbell
subhodip kdetv
xris orpie
15 years, 1 month
Can we have a Delta-DVD release
by James Gallagher
The problem of space on the DVD has been an issue in the last few DVD releases of Fedora, requiring the removal of previously included packages.
Now, isn't it the case that many fedora users download F8, F9, F10 ... iso images every 6 months or so?
So wouldn't it make sense to have a delta image made from successive releases and an accompanying script which would read from a previously existing iso image or disk and recreate the "full" iso image, splitting it into 2 dvd disc images if required or merging for transfer to a double-sided dvd or large usb stick?
(I don't think it would be a huge ask of anaconda to install from 2 disks rather than 1)
Even if the image size is kept below 4.3GB for a single disk, the delta download would be welcomed by many.
After all, I think some of the large language packages would have a pretty small delta between 6 month release cycles.
btw, I don't expect this ready for F11 ;)
15 years, 1 month
Re: Can we have a Delta-DVD release
by James Gallagher
--- On Wed, 22/4/09, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Can we have a Delta-DVD release
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 9:36 AM
> On 04/22/09 00:14, James Gallagher
> wrote:
> > Now a question for anyone: does the F11 beta release
> contain lots of
> > debug code and if so would you expect the final dvd to
> have a smaller
> > delta iso?
>
> Unlikely.
>
> > And one further point: wouldn't this be particularly
> useful for
> > successive test releases, alphas, beta,
> release-candidates, since the
> > deltas would be tiny.
>
> That probably would work out much better, yes. One
> could try F11-alpha -> F11-beta to figure. There
> was the mass rebuild inbeetween though, so these delta size
> probably is higher than usual. F11-beta ->
> F11-prerelease should give a more realistic picture.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
Don't have a F11 pre-release, but I found the Fedora 11 Alpha x86_64 iso
image and ran a makedeltaiso for that against the Beta. It came out at ~1.9GB,
not much different to the F10-F11 delta (2.1GB)
Out of interest, and since it was mentioned above, I also tried jigdo,
downloading F11 Beta and using F11 Alpha as the "old" disk, it was useless!
It said only 10 of the 3006 for the template were found, and then proceeded
to download practically the whole DVD, I stopped it at ~ 3.5G.
So, looks like the deltaisos provide about 50% saving. If anyone can test
F11 Beta against a pre-release candidate that would be appreciated.
Jamesa
15 years, 1 month
