Hi folks,
Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the initial import:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456
and there are now new pending bugs that have not seen responses too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250914
We've waited for responses to PRs in the past and then had to use proven packager rights to update and maintain the package:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/commits/rawhide
Since a Neuro-SIG package depends on it, we're happy to take it over.
Here's what I could get from fedora-active-user:
python fedora_active_user.py --user marxin --email mliska@suse.cz --nofas Last action on koji: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 tag_package_owners entry created by humaton [still active]
Last package update on bodhi: 2020-06-29 07:10:30 on package python-pebble-4.5.3-1.fc33 Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
Last email on mailing list: ERROR:active-user:name 'mailinglist' is not defined
Here's the tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256491
Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:56 PM Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the initial import:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456
and there are now new pending bugs that have not seen responses too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250914
We've waited for responses to PRs in the past and then had to use proven packager rights to update and maintain the package:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/commits/rawhide
Since a Neuro-SIG package depends on it, we're happy to take it over.
Here's what I could get from fedora-active-user:
python fedora_active_user.py --user marxin --email mliska@suse.cz --nofas Last action on koji: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 tag_package_owners entry created by humaton [still active]
Last package update on bodhi: 2020-06-29 07:10:30 on package python-pebble-4.5.3-1.fc33 Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
Last email on mailing list: ERROR:active-user:name 'mailinglist' is not defined
Here's the tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256491
-- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble
You need to query for `python3-pebble`.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02. cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64
I use `fedrq` these days.
$ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src
-- Sandro
Thank you !
Em ter., 2 de jan. de 2024 às 17:05, Sandro lists@penguinpee.nl escreveu:
On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble
You need to query for `python3-pebble`.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02. cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64
I use `fedrq` these days.
$ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src
-- Sandro
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:05 PM Sandro lists@penguinpee.nl wrote:
On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble
You need to query for `python3-pebble`.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02. cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64
I use `fedrq` these days.
$ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src
-- Sandro
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once approved? That needs a proven packager in the current situation, since the sole maintainer is unresponsive.
No offense, but you are kinda hijacking this thread.
-- Sandro
I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a review in this thread. My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date. I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not responding, if not, I can close it. Also, I noticed any maintainer can merge it. I am a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here to hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite.
Em qui., 4 de jan. de 2024 às 20:07, Sandro lists@penguinpee.nl escreveu:
On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once approved? That needs a proven packager in the current situation, since the sole maintainer is unresponsive.
No offense, but you are kinda hijacking this thread.
-- Sandro
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On 05-01-2024 01:50, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a review in this thread.
It's perfectly fine asking for a review. But that should go into its own mail to the list or, preferably, to ${package}-maintainers@fp.o.
Currently, this thread aims to solve the maintainer situation with regards to pebble. Once that's done, the package will be handed over to an active maintainer.
Since you appear to be interested in maintaining pebble, you might even get to be added as a maintainer once the current situation has been solved.
My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date.
That depends...
I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not responding, if not, I can close it.
Leave it open. A proven packager can still merge it or you may get to merge it yourself once the package has been handed over.
Also, I noticed any maintainer can merge it.
Yes. Anyone with commit rights can merge. But currently there's only one person enlisted and only that person can add co-maintainers.
I am a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here to hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite.
It's all good. This thread is regarding the non-responsive maintainer check [1]. It shouldn't become a discussion thread. That's all I was/am concerned about.
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_...