Alexander Kahl wrote:
Please define "massive" if you're keeping exactly
what's needed to keep
everything running and prune anything else by using a sophisticated,
tunable garbage collection mechanism.
The whole point of the exercise was to do a lot of updates. But the more
updates we do, the more disk space the old versions you're keeping around
are going to eat up.
> and also not compliant with the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy
Standard).
Yep. It's much better, comparable to the GAC (global assembly cache) of
the CLR (Mono),
Yuck! Do you seriously call that "better"?
Anyway, the FHS is not really negotiable.
Kevin Kofler