On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:33 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 11. 11. 21 v 15:24 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> ELN-extras will be a new build target and compose similar in behavior
> to ELN, but closer to EPEL in function. It will be a place to prepare
> and maintain packages that may be desired for EPEL N+1 while RHEL N+1
> is still being incubated in ELN.
For these not aware what ELN is:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/
Too many abbreviations. :( So the situation is:
EPEL are extra packages for RHEL.
EPEL-next are extra packages for CentOS Stream. [I still think this should be CentOS
Stream {extra,epel,next}]
ELN-extras are extra packages for ELN (which is rebuild of rawhide in RHEL like
compose).
Right?
Can this change proposal document the name of dist-git branches? I do not see it
anywhere.
That's because, like ELN, it will use the Rawhide branch. Separate
branches for ELN/ELN-extras are discouraged (but we are working on
ways to allow them for specific cases).