On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 17:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chris Adams
<cmadams(a)hiwaay.net> wrote:
> Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg(a)gmail.com>
said:
>> And as the general rule goes "native configuration breaks legacy
>> configuration" so if a native systemd $service file does exist than
>> changing service via chkconfig no longer will work.
>
> As an admin, this is crap. Where does this "general rule" come from?
> As strong desire to piss off the people that actually use your software?
So "different == crap" ?
If it does provide a hard to use interface I'd understand the
frustration but only because it is NEW / DIFFERENT does not mean that
the world is falling over.
In general, yes, it does (just not to you):
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/fedora-culture-clashes/
...however this case (breaking service/chkconfig) seems like such a huge
pointless difference that I can't imagine RHEL-7 not requiring that it's
fixed. So the only real question is how long Fedora users have to live
with it broken.