Adam Williamson wrote:
During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release
criteria.
John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final
content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA
(myself, Will Woods and James Laska), release engineering (Jesse Keating),
anaconda team (especially Denise Dumas and Peter Jones) and desktop team
(Christopher Aillon and Matthias Clasen, who provided suggestions at an
earlier stage).
So once again things get decided by a small group of people in an in-person
meeting and whoever didn't happen to be at the right place at the right time
only gets to know the final decision after the fact? :-( I've complained
many times about this lack of transparency and I'll continue to do so.
Plus, why was the KDE SIG not invited? (We had at least 4 KDE SIG folks
present at FUDCon.) Are you planning to ship Fedora 13 even if the KDE Live
image is broken?
Kevin Kofler