Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 11:10 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
praiskup wrote:
> [...]
> Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But
> at the
> same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason.
... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break
builds.
For one of ours, the .spec file contained:
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
BuildRequires: foo-devel
Yes, this is not canonical pkgconfig(foo) & perfect & stuff, but it's
worked for years. With the new changes, it breaks builds:
[...] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2704/17392704/ro
ot.log
DEBUG util.py:421: Error: package
pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.0-1.fc26.aarch64 conflicts with pkgconfig <
1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.aarch64
This is known issue (not
really caused by pkgconf change, but it is
caused by bug in dnf), see: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6597
- FChE
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
-Igor Gnatenko