Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goorah(a)gmail.com) said:
> OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this
road, we'll
> eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use,
> and that seems like it will eventually be problematic. Is there some
> generic moniker that could be used for this usage?
To be honest that would be a great idea. But I don't know any other
active and vibrant community like milkymist and openmoko alike. I
suggest that, let it be like this. If it gets momentum and other HW
communities pop in, we can rename it, I won't object.
Works for me.
Bill