On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 04:24 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially
> if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have been
> unapproved, not only for F17, but forever.
So, just to be clear, you're saying that even if usrmove had landed in
an entirely perfect and complete form the day after F16 branched, it
should still have been rejected?
You're talking about completely theoretical situation nobody is arguing
on. It is theoretical because there is still not _perfect and complete
form_ of the UsrMove feature. Yes, most of the objections to it were
eventually fixed/workarounded/rebutted but I'm sure not all of them.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb