On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Please stop rewriting history. The spec was proposed, flaws were pointed
> out in the review, and there was no willingness to address those flaws
> in any meaningful way.
The purported "flaws" were of 2 kinds:
* claims of underspecification that are irrelevant in practice because it
was obvious to everyone [...]
If that's the case why can't it be in the spec then? Why leave it out
and assume that "everyone would do X" ?