Bill Nottingham wrote:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) (forum(a)ru.bir.ru) said:
>> I don't think shipping separate rebuilds of core system daemons that
>> consist of adding 66k of non-upstream patch is a good idea.
> I'm completely do not understand - why we do not want provide free
> choose for free users?
For the same reason we don't ship non-upstream kernel modules; it's a
matter of maintenance load and coherence.
I'm afraid I don't completely
understand you. About what maintenance
load you are speaking?
Is there any polices or guidelines about it?