Doug Ledford wrote:
You only need enough details to know that it isn't impossible,
not
enough to know the exact route to get to the end goal.
Only an actually working implementation, or a detailed technical description
of one, can prove that it really isn't impossible and doesn't lead to
unsurmountable technical difficulties that make it suck in practice.
Please, if you have objections to the policy, then state them. What
I
got from your email is you objected to me saying set policy first,
technical implementation later, and then you never once said anything
about the policy nor the technical implementation. Should I then take
your silence on those issues to mean that you are OK with the policy and
OK with the proposed technical implementation?
I'm going to reply to your original message.
Kevin Kofler