On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:02:42PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I think that's probably worthwhile. The way I see it, we have a
large number of users who prefer an entirely RPM-based system,
although most users would be better off with an Atomic system and
just layering a few RPMs on top. I suspect we can satisfy both
groups of users while doing only a minimal amount of work. Making
patches conditional is not so hard.
I definitely would like to see as much "magic" and infrastructure
support as we can muster for this, so we avoid the complication of SCL
macros -- the original idea there was that the same spec files could be
used for non-SCL packages, and it got so complex that that didn't
really pan out.
Fedora Project Leader