On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 00:05 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> The issue right now appears to be the same as when we have a critical
> security or bugfix that has to be fast-tracked and we have LOTS of pkgs
> in updates-testing.
I don't know if this will help. Once a release has gotten a number of
updates, mashing that release will take a long time, regardless of how
many new updates are going in. This is particularly bad of say
11-updates or 12-updates, but -testing generally goes much faster as
there are less things in there (if bodhi obsoletes are doing the right
thing).
At the risk of complicating the world would it make any sense for us to
have (in increasing order of importance)
updates-testing
updates
updates-important
packages that are security or critical go from updates-testing to
updates-important - and that happens as necessary
all other updates go from updates-testing to updates once a month.
-sv