On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 14:49 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Chris Murphy <
lists(a)colorremedies.com> wrote:
> Yet this bug [1] is routinely voted
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 Not that
anyone should go try to make sense out of a three year old bug with
over 100 comments... but the gist is "nah, we don't want to fix it
now, therefore the release criteria don't matter".
That is not an accurate summary. For F20 it was rejected as a Beta
blocker and accepted as a Final blocker. It was addressed by preventing
the installer from allowing /boot to be on a btrfs subvolume. For F21
anaconda actually allowed /boot on btrfs subvol; this wasn't
intentional but an oversight, but no-one proposed it as a blocker for
any 21 milestone and it slipped through. For F22 we handled it in the
same way as F20: it was accepted as a blocker and considered addressed
by preventing the installer from allowing /boot on btrfs.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net