John Poelstra wrote:
The current FESCo might also want to consider taking more of a
leadership role in monitoring the release processes, tracking the
schedule, and evaluating the quality of the release under development
and our ability to release on time. As the group responsible for
guiding the technical direction of our releases I think this is
something they should be more involved in. I'd be glad to help gather
data they might need to do this and there might be others who would be
willing to help too.
I'm suggesting more proactive leadership from FESCo and clear
initiatives to take Fedora to the next level versus only being
responsible for approving features, proven packagers, and policy matters.
And when should we find the time for that? Our meetings already usually take
2 hours, and during the rest of the week, we have other things to do as
well. Being on FESCo is not a paid full-time job!
Kevin Kofler