On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 Adam Miller maxamillion@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts where needed/applicable.
ok.
It shouldn't but it can in the future, I was more or less replicating this information in the beginning to hopefully leave some space for this to change in the future of the Fedora Modularization efforts because a module could potentially have it's own versioning scheme outside of the content inside of it.
Has it been decided that modules are docker containers?
No. AIUI, a docker container is one potential delivery artifact for a module. There are others, such as RPM repos. So it is not a strict "modules are containers" mapping.
josh