On 11/20/2009 04:37 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Those aren't the only alternatives. There's also the alternative of
the maintainers voluntarily making a change to accommodate feedback.
A situation where we have one part of the Fedora community giving
unwanted marching orders to the other parts of the Fedora community is
not an optimal result. (Where that's happened before on rare
occasions, it's never been a good thing.)
I'm not saying that FESCo shouldn't have purview over the issue, just
that you're really drawing a black and white picture where there's
clearly some in-between.
Yes. FESCo is a place to escalate issues when we fail to reach consensus
with the maintainers themselves. Everytime, we do this, it is a warning
sign that something has gone wrong significantly regardless of the
decision being made by FESCo.
Rahul